Muzzle Brake With Conical Inner Portion For Recoil Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing muzzle brakes do not adequately reduce firearm recoil and rise, particularly for multiple shots, and can affect accuracy due to gas deflection on the bullet.

Innovation Solution

A muzzle brake design featuring an outer cylindrical portion and an inner conical portion, with specifically oriented slots and ports, that directs and vents propellant gases to counteract recoil and torque, while the inner conical portion peels away gases from the bullet to prevent deflection and improve accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If traditional muzzle brakes with baffles or ports are used, then some recoil reduction is achieved, but firearm rise and torque are not adequately reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecoil reductionVSAvoidmuzzle control during multiple shots
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The muzzle brake is divided into multiple functional segments: an outer body with ports for primary recoil reduction, an inner conical portion with channels for gas redirection, and a forcing cone for gas peeling. Each segment performs a specific function in the recoil management sequence, allowing comprehensive control of recoil, rise, and torque separately and simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces a conical inner portion with three-dimensional channel structures that redirect gases in multiple directions (forward, lateral, and downward). This multi-dimensional gas redirection approach addresses not only rearward recoil but also upward rise and rotational torque, which traditional linear port designs cannot handle effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Force

If ports are drilled into the muzzle brake to redirect gases, then some recoil is reduced, but accuracy deteriorates due to gas deflection on the bullet

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecoil reductionVSAvoidshooting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The forcing cone is positioned at the very front of the muzzle brake, creating a preliminary action that peels away propellant gases from the bullet path before the bullet exits the barrel. This preliminary gas separation prevents subsequent gas deflection on the bullet, maintaining accuracy while still allowing rearward ports to reduce recoil.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The inner conical portion with its channels acts as an intermediary structure between the propellant gases and the external environment. It provides a controlled pathway for gases to escape through lateral and forward channels, preventing uncontrolled gas expansion that would deflect the bullet, while still achieving recoil reduction through the outer ports.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Force

If larger baffles are used to block gases, then recoil is reduced, but device complexity and size increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecoil reductionVSAvoidmuzzle brake structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses pneumatic principles by creating controlled pressure differentials through the port and channel system. Propellant gases are channeled through specific pathways that exploit pressure gradients to generate forward and lateral thrust components, reducing recoil without requiring large solid baffles. The system converts gas pressure into useful directional forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The muzzle brake incorporates a porous-like structure with multiple ports and channels distributed throughout the body and inner conical portion. This distributed porosity allows gases to escape through numerous small openings rather than requiring large baffle structures, reducing both the size and complexity of the device while maintaining effective recoil reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Significantly reduces firearm recoil, rise, and torque, allowing for better muzzle control during multiple shots and enhancing accuracy by preventing gas deflection on the bullet.

Implementation Method 1

takes advantage of expanding propellant gases from a discharged round

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas expansion:

Implementation Method 2

redirect the expanding gases from the discharged round and use them to produce directed thrust in a particular direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThrust:

Implementation Method 3

The inner conical portion is designed to peel away gases from the discharged bullet so as to prevent gas deflection on the bullet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas separation:

Data Source

PatentUS9341426B1Muzzle brake for firearm
Publication Date: 2016.05.17 ROCK RIVER ARMS INC
  • US9341426B1 patent drawing
  • US9341426B1 patent drawing
  • US9341426B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A firearm muzzle brake may include a substantially cylindrical hollow first portion having a first end and a second end; a pair of opposed rows of slots extending through the first portion, each row extending axially along a side of the first portion; a pair of rows of ports extending through the first portion, each row extending axially along the first portion above one of the rows of slots; and a second portion having a first end received in the second end of the first portion, a second end, a central aperture extending through the second portion and being in fluid communication with the hollow first portion such that a bullet can pass through the first and second portions.