Signature-Reduced Muzzle Brake with Gas Cooling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional muzzle brakes for small and medium-caliber weapons have a high external signature due to heat and propellant gas emissions, making it easy to detect the location of the weapon, which can be disruptive.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a gas reduction device with cooling fins and materials, such as a grid or honeycomb structure, to minimize gas flow and volume, redirecting propellant gases back into the barrel, reducing recoil and muzzle flash while integrating a cooling mechanism to dissipate heat and noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If propellant gases are directed to the rear through conventional muzzle brake designs, then recoil absorption is improved, but external signature (heat and gas emissions) increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecoil absorptionVSAvoidexternal signature
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The muzzle brake is divided into multiple functional sections: a first section with rearwardly directed impact surfaces for recoil absorption, and a second section with laterally directed deflection surfaces for gas dispersion. This segmentation allows different portions of the propellant gas to be handled differently - some redirected for recoil reduction, others dispersed sideways to reduce visible signature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the muzzle brake have different local functions: the first section features impact surfaces optimized for recoil absorption, while the second section features deflection surfaces optimized for gas dispersion. Additionally, cooling elements are selectively positioned in the gas flow path to cool specific portions of the hot propellant gases, reducing thermal signature locally where it matters most.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-generated harmful factors

If cooling mechanisms are added to reduce thermal signature, then external signature is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal signatureVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling elements utilize the kinetic energy and flow of the propellant gas itself to drive the cooling process. The gas flow passes over and through the cooling elements, using its own momentum to enhance heat transfer without requiring external power sources or active cooling systems. The structure cools itself using the operational flow conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling elements have a porous or lattice structure that increases surface area for heat transfer while maintaining gas flow capability. This porous design allows the hot propellant gas to pass through while being cooled by the increased surface area contact, effectively reducing thermal signature without requiring solid barriers that would block the gas flow and compromise recoil reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

3Object-generated harmful factors

If gas flow is restricted to reduce emissions, then external signature is reduced, but recoil absorption efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas emissionsVSAvoidrecoil absorption efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The muzzle brake segments the gas flow into different paths: one path directs gases rearward through impact surfaces for recoil absorption, while another path directs gases laterally through deflection surfaces for emission reduction. This segmentation allows the system to maintain effective recoil reduction while simultaneously reducing visible and thermal signature by dispersing some gases sideways rather than allowing them to escape directly rearward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces the visible signature of the muzzle brake, minimizing recoil, smoke development, and noise while maintaining effective recoil absorption and silencing functions.

Implementation Method 1

The design incorporates a gas reduction device with cooling fins and materials, such as a grid or honeycomb structure, to minimize gas flow and volume, redirecting propellant gases back into the barrel, reducing recoil and muzzle flash while integrating a cooling mechanism to dissipate heat and noise.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

The propellant gas is cooled by the cooling elements, in particular by the cooling fins, and/or cooling material, and/or cooling lattice, and/or cooling honeycomb, with the aid of the propellant gas flow itself.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

Muzzle brakes have the task of redirecting the powder gases escaping forward after the bullet has passed to the side or to the rear and thus using the combustion gases to reduce the recoil of the barrel. Immediately after the projectile has left the barrel, the pressurized combustion gases from the propellant escape from the barrel, partially hitting the deflector surfaces of the muzzle brake. They are deflected at right angles or even slightly backwards by the impact surfaces, thereby transferring part of their energy to the muzzle brake and thus to the barrel.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentEP2567175B1Signature-reduced muzzle brake
Publication Date: 2017.06.07 RHEINMETALL WAFFE MUNITION GMBH
  • EP2567175B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2567175B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2567175B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A muzzle brake (1) of a weapon or a weapons system, in particular for small- and medium-calibre weapons, that has a reduced outer signature with respect to heat and/or propellant gas emissions is proposed. For this purpose, the propellant gas emerging from the barrel (3) is diverted to the gas outlet openings (8, 10) of the muzzle brake (1) in order to impinge on them - to absorb the recoil - and is then made to pass further to the rear, and thereby cooled in a device (12).