MVDR Beamforming for Audio Source Localization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional audio source localization systems face challenges with poor spatial resolution and noise interference, leading to inaccurate estimation of audio source positions due to the use of delay-and-sum beams, which are not suitable for acoustic transmission.

Innovation Solution

The system employs Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) beams for both audio source localization and acoustic transmission, using a metric of smallest distortion rather than maximum response power to determine the best beam, providing better spatial resolution and handling noise effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If delay-and-sum beams are used for audio source localization, then the system is simple to implement, but spatial resolution is poor and noise interference is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidspatial resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the beamforming parameters from conventional delay-and-sum to Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) beams. This parameter change transforms the beamforming approach to achieve superior spatial resolution and noise rejection while maintaining systematic implementability through established signal processing frameworks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by using MVDR beams that provide direction-dependent optimization. Each beam is tailored to minimize variance in specific directions while maintaining distortionless response in the look direction, thereby achieving local optimization of spatial resolution and noise rejection for each beam direction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If delay-and-sum beams are used for audio source localization, then the system complexity is low, but noise rejection capability is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidnoise interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the beamforming parameters from conventional delay-and-sum to Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) beams. This parameter change transforms the beamforming approach to achieve superior spatial resolution and noise rejection while maintaining systematic implementability through established signal processing frameworks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of noise into a beneficial filtering mechanism. By using MVDR beams that minimize variance in all directions except the look direction, the system transforms noise interference into an opportunity for enhanced signal separation, where noise components are systematically suppressed while desired signals are preserved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Measurement precision

If MVDR beams are used for both audio source localization and acoustic transmission, then spatial resolution and noise reduction are improved, but the metric selection becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio source localization accuracyVSAvoidmetric calculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by using the same MVDR beamforming approach and distortion metric for both audio source localization and acoustic transmission functions. This multi-functional application simplifies the overall system architecture while achieving high performance in both localization accuracy and transmission quality through a unified beamforming framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the evaluation metric from maximum response power to smallest distortion metric. This parameter change in the selection criterion enables the system to achieve better localization accuracy and transmission quality by selecting beams that minimize distortion rather than maximize power, providing a more robust performance metric.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If conventional beamforming is used, then the system is easy to operate, but system performance predictability is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidperformance predictability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the beamforming parameters from conventional delay-and-sum to Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) beams. This parameter change transforms the beamforming approach to achieve superior spatial resolution and noise rejection while maintaining systematic implementability through established signal processing frameworks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through the use of distortion metrics that provide systematic evaluation of beam performance. By calculating and comparing distortion levels across different beams, the system establishes a feedback mechanism that enables predictable selection of optimal beams, thereby improving performance predictability while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8233352B2Audio source localization system and method
Publication Date: 2012.07.31 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD
  • US8233352B2 patent drawing
  • US8233352B2 patent drawing
  • US8233352B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for performing audio source localization that uses minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) beams or other super-directive beams that are more suitable for reducing noise, interference and/or acoustic coupling than the delay-and-sum beams conventionally used in performing audio source localization based on a Steered Response Power (SRP) approach. Since super-directive beams such as MVDR beams do not provide good properties for performing conventional SRP-based audio source localization, an embodiment of the present invention utilizes a different metric than maximum response power in order to determine which of a plurality of beams provides the best response for audio source localization. This metric involves identifying which beam provides the smallest measure of distortion with respect to a reference power or reference response.