N-furcated Normalization for Blending Dissimilar Media Populations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing media content ranking algorithms prioritize popularity, often skewing search results towards free content, leading to a homogenous user experience and inadequate exposure for paid content, which may offer superior quality but is overshadowed by free options due to higher visibility based on aggregate views and downloads.

Innovation Solution

A system that blends dissimilar populations of media content items by analyzing user browsing information, assigning scores based on median values, and ranking items to create a single, diverse search result list that includes both free and paid content, promoting a more comprehensive selection of media options.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If media content items are ranked based on aggregate popularity metrics (views, downloads), then the ranking process is simple and efficient, but paid content is drowned out and users are limited to homogenous free content options

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveranking efficiencyVSAvoidcontent diversity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the media content into different populations (free content and paid content) and applies separate normalization processes to each population. This allows paid and free content to be evaluated independently within their own contexts before being combined into a unified ranking, preventing paid content from being drowned out by the sheer volume of free content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the ranking parameters by applying population-specific normalization factors. Instead of using raw aggregate metrics directly, the system normalizes metrics within each population and then combines them using weighting factors. This parameter transformation enables paid content to compete fairly against free content despite differences in absolute view counts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If all media content is blended into a single ranking list, then user choice is enhanced with diverse options, but the ranking algorithm becomes complex requiring population analysis and normalization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent diversityVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The algorithm segments the ranking process into distinct stages: population identification, within-population normalization, cross-population scoring, and final ranking. This segmented approach manages complexity by breaking down the complex task of blending dissimilar populations into manageable, sequential steps that can be implemented systematically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate normalization scores as a mediator between raw popularity metrics and final rankings. These intermediate scores standardize different populations before combination, acting as a buffer that simplifies the final ranking calculation while preserving the diversity benefits of multiple content types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If free content is prioritized based on higher aggregate views, then the system is easy to implement with simple metrics, but paid content vendors receive inadequate exposure despite offering premium features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidcontent quality representation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the ranking parameters by applying population-specific normalization that accounts for the inherent differences between free and paid content markets. Paid content naturally receives adjusted weighting that reflects its premium nature, ensuring adequate exposure while maintaining implementation feasibility through systematic parameter transformation rather than ad-hoc adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different quality assessment criteria locally to different content populations. Free content is evaluated based on its own market dynamics while paid content is evaluated with consideration for its premium positioning. This local quality approach ensures each content type is judged by appropriate standards, improving overall content quality representation without complicating the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9558222B1Blended ranking of dissimilar populations using an N-furcated normalization technique
Publication Date: 2017.01.31 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9558222B1 patent drawing
  • US9558222B1 patent drawing
  • US9558222B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for blending dissimilar, ordered populations into a single selection for users are disclosed herein. In an aspect, content items belonging to distinct parent populations which display a large disparity in the value which is used for ranking purposes, can be displayed together in a single continuously ranked list for simple browsing and selection by users. Further, a score can be assigned to the respective media content items based at least in part on a median value of a distribution of media content items corresponding to the respective parent populations and this score can be used as a normalized, universal value with which to rank content from all dissimilar populations together.