N-Tree Routing for Fair Bandwidth and Low Delay

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional N-tree algorithms fail to ensure fair bandwidth distribution and minimize end-to-end delay in multipoint communication networks, leading to traffic congestion and suboptimal AV quality in applications like video conferencing.

Innovation Solution

A terminal apparatus and method that employs a 'water-spread' policy to construct N-trees by measuring link bandwidth and round-trip times, forming packet transmission paths to ensure equal bandwidth distribution, and dynamically updating forwarding tables to optimize route convergence and minimize latency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional N-tree algorithms are used for route construction, then the routing mechanism is simple to implement, but fair bandwidth distribution cannot be ensured and traffic congestion occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting mechanism simplicityVSAvoidbandwidth distribution fairness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the routing parameters from simple shortest-path metrics to composite metrics that include available bandwidth, delay, and load information. The route construction algorithm uses these modified parameters to select paths that ensure fair bandwidth distribution while avoiding congestion, thereby resolving the contradiction between simplicity and fairness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where nodes continuously exchange information about link bandwidth, delay, and current load. This feedback is used to dynamically adjust route constructions, ensuring that bandwidth is distributed fairly across all participants while preventing traffic congestion, thus improving reliability without significantly increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Speed

If conventional routing algorithms prioritize shortest path, then transmission speed is maximized, but end-to-end delay increases and AV quality degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission speedVSAvoidend-to-end delay
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the routing parameters from simple hop count or geometric distance to composite metrics that include transmission speed, available bandwidth, and delay information. This allows the algorithm to select routes that maintain high transmission speed while minimizing end-to-end delay, thereby improving AV quality without sacrificing transmission efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If dynamic route adjustment is implemented to minimize delay, then AV quality is improved, but network complexity and computational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAV qualityVSAvoidnetwork complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the route construction process into distinct phases: metric collection, metric evaluation, and route selection. Each phase handles specific tasks independently, which simplifies the overall complexity while enabling dynamic route adjustment to minimize delay and improve AV quality. The segmentation allows for modular implementation and reduces computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of manufacture

If existing unicast route control methods are used, then implementation is straightforward, but equal bandwidth sharing and minimal delay routes cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation easeVSAvoidbandwidth fairness and delay minimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enhances existing unicast route control methods by integrating multiple functions into a unified algorithm. The same routing mechanism handles both bandwidth fairness and delay minimization simultaneously, maintaining implementation ease while achieving superior reliability in terms of bandwidth distribution and AV quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8520556B2Terminal and N-tree constructing method
Publication Date: 2013.08.27 PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP
  • US8520556B2 patent drawing
  • US8520556B2 patent drawing
  • US8520556B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A terminal apparatus minimizes traffic congestion by reducing end-to-end delay and maximizes the bandwidth available in shared N-tree ALM nodes. In this terminal apparatus, an optimal stream path information table stores N-tree session information for all nodes. A server forwarding table stores bandwidth-fair ALM route information for all nodes in a specific N-tree session. An ALM forwarding table constructor updates N-tree session information stored in an optimal stream path information table using network metrics and heuristic rules stored in a heuristic rule database, executes ALM_N-tree algorithm using updated N-tree session information, and thereby generates bandwidth-fair ALM route information.