Nanocarrier Property Prediction for Payload-Independent Formulation Screening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current nucleic acid delivery systems face challenges such as off-target effects, immune activation, difficulty in manufacturing at scale, and limited tissue targeting, particularly with viral vectors like AAVs, which are expensive and immunogenic, and non-viral vectors like LNPs are less suitable for targeting tissues other than the liver.

Innovation Solution

Training machine learning models to predict the transfection efficiency and structural properties of nanocarriers using physico-chemical properties of nanocarriers, such as peptide dendrimer/lipid hybrids, independent of the payload, to facilitate the design and selection of nanocarriers for various applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If machine learning models are trained to predict nanocarrier properties using payload-dependent features, then prediction accuracy for specific applications is improved, but the model loses universality and cannot predict properties across different payloads and applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel universality
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes payload-specific features from the prediction model inputs, retaining only nanocarrier formulation features (peptide sequence, lipid composition, ratios, molecular weights). This extraction allows the model to predict nanocarrier properties universally across different payloads and applications, resolving the contradiction between prediction accuracy for specific cases and general model universality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal prediction model that can accurately predict nanocarrier properties (transfection efficiency, cellular uptake, cytotoxicity) across multiple different payloads and applications without requiring payload-specific training. This multi-functionality approach allows a single model to serve diverse purposes, from gene therapy to cancer treatment, thereby achieving both accuracy and versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If extensive experimental testing is performed to characterize nanocarrier formulations, then prediction accuracy and reliability are improved, but the time and resources required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computational characterization of nanocarrier formulations using machine learning predictions before conducting actual experimental testing. By pre-screening candidate formulations in silico to identify promising candidates with desired properties (high transfection efficiency, low cytotoxicity), the approach reduces the number of experiments needed, thereby saving time and resources while maintaining reliability through experimental validation of top candidates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the nanocarrier system through computational models that replicate and predict the behavior of physical nanocarrier formulations. This in silico modeling allows extensive characterization and optimization without requiring proportional physical experimentation, significantly reducing the time and resources needed while maintaining predictive reliability through careful model training on experimental data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If the design space for nanocarrier formulation is explored exhaustively, then the optimal formulation is identified, but the cost and complexity of formulation and testing increase prohibitively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformulation optimizationVSAvoidformulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary computational screening using machine learning models to evaluate and rank potential nanocarrier formulations before actual preparation and testing. By pre-calculating predicted properties (transfection efficiency, cellular uptake, cytotoxicity) for multiple formulation variants, the approach identifies optimal candidates in silico, reducing the need to physically prepare and test all possible formulations, thereby lowering costs and complexity while maintaining thorough optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates computational representations (digital twins) of nanocarrier formulations that can be extensively analyzed and compared without physical manufacturing. These virtual models allow exploration of the design space through simulation and prediction, enabling identification of optimal formulations through iterative optimization in silico before physical production, thereby reducing the actual formulation and testing complexity required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250384971A1Methods for characterisation of nanocarriers
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 NUNTIUS THERAPEUTICS LTD
  • US20250384971A1 patent drawing
  • US20250384971A1 patent drawing
  • US20250384971A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention provides methods for predicting functional and/or structural properties of a nanocarrier that is a non-viral delivery system, along with related methods, systems and products. Functional properties of a nanocarrier may include transfection efficiency, structural properties of a nanocarrier characterise physico-chemical properties such as polydispersity, size and zeta potential. Methods include computational modelling such as machine learning and related statistical techniques.