Biodegradable Nanocomposite Layers for Bone Regeneration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current bone regeneration methods face challenges in effectively addressing skeletal deficiencies due to trauma, tumors, and bone diseases, as existing treatments often require multiple surgical procedures and have limitations in restoring normal bone function.

Innovation Solution

A biodegradable and bioresorbable nanocomposite structure is developed, comprising multiple polymer layers and spacer particles, with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles, designed to be stacked and coated for specific tissue regeneration, allowing for controlled degradation and integration with the body.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional bone regeneration methods are used, then surgical procedures can be performed to restore bone function, but multiple surgical procedures are required and normal bone function restoration is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone function restorationVSAvoidmultiple surgical procedures
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is divided into multiple layers with different compositions and degradation rates. The first layer contains fast-degrading polymer with growth factors for initial tissue regeneration, while the second layer contains slow-degrading polymer for sustained structural support, eliminating the need for multiple surgical procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Growth factors and biochemical cues are pre-loaded into the implant layers before implantation. The first layer releases growth factors immediately to stimulate rapid tissue regeneration, while the second layer provides sustained release, achieving complete bone function restoration in a single procedure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If a single polymer composition is used in the implant, then the structure is simple to manufacture, but it cannot match different degradation rates required for different tissue types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedegradation rate matchingVSAvoidmulti-layer structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different layers of the implant have different polymer compositions and degradation rates tailored to specific tissue regeneration needs. The first layer uses fast-degrading polymer for initial soft tissue regeneration, while the second layer uses slow-degrading polymer for long-term structural support, allowing each region to have optimized properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The implant combines multiple polymer materials with different degradation characteristics in a layered composite structure. This allows the device to provide both fast and slow degradation zones, matching the requirements of different tissue types without requiring a single complex material

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Speed

If the implant degrades too quickly, then tissue regeneration can proceed rapidly, but the implant loses structural support before tissue is fully formed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue regeneration rateVSAvoidstructural support
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is segmented into two functional layers: the first layer degrades quickly to release growth factors and stimulate rapid tissue regeneration, while the second layer degrades slowly to maintain structural support throughout the entire regeneration process, solving the contradiction between speed and strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second layer of slow-degrading polymer continues to provide structural support continuously while the first layer stimulates rapid regeneration. This continuous support ensures the implant maintains strength throughout the regeneration process, preventing premature failure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentEP3203935B1Bone regeneration using biodegradable polymeric nanocomposite materials and applications of the same
Publication Date: 2019.11.20 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIV OF ARKANSAS
  • EP3203935B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3203935B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3203935B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

A biocompatible structure includes one or more base structures for regeneration of different tissues. Each base structure includes alternately stacked polymer layers and spacer layers. The polymer layer includes a polymer and tissue forming nanoparticles. The polymer includes polyurethane. The tissue forming nanoparticles includes hydroxypatites (HAP) nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, or nanofibers. The spacer layer includes bone particles, polymeric nanoparticles, or nanofibers. The weight percentage of tissue forming nanoparticles to the polymer in the polymer layer in one base structure is different from that in the other base structures. A method of producing the biocompatible structure includes forming multiple base structures stacked together, coating the stacked multiple base structures, and plasma treating the coated structure.