Biodegradable Nanocomposite Implant for Targeted Bone Regeneration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current surgical procedures for addressing skeletal deficiencies, such as bone trauma, tumors, and diseases, often require multiple interventions and have limitations in effectively restoring normal bone function and tissue regeneration.

Innovation Solution

A biocompatible structure composed of biodegradable and bioresorbable nanocomposite materials, specifically formed by alternating layers of polymers and spacer particles, which are designed to match the specific properties of different tissues at an implant site, facilitating targeted regeneration through controlled degradation and bioactive material delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional surgical procedures are used to address skeletal deficiencies, then bone function can be restored, but multiple interventions are required and tissue regeneration is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone function restorationVSAvoidtissue regeneration efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is divided into multiple alternating layers of biodegradable polymer and bioactive material (such as hydroxyapatite or demineralized bone matrix), creating a segmented structure that provides both mechanical support and biological functionality in a single intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite materials combining biodegradable polymers with bioactive substances to create an implant that simultaneously provides structural integrity and promotes tissue regeneration, eliminating the need for multiple separate procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Adaptability or versatility

If biodegradable nanocomposite materials are used, then targeted tissue regeneration is enabled, but the structure must match specific tissue properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue regeneration targetingVSAvoidstructure design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different layers of the implant have different compositions and degradation rates tailored to match specific tissue types at the implant site, with each layer providing localized functionality for targeted regeneration of bone, muscle, or other tissues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The degradation rate, porosity, and mechanical properties of each layer are adjusted as parameters to match the specific requirements of different tissues, allowing the same basic structure to be adapted for various regeneration applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Duration of action of moving object

If alternating layers of polymer and spacer particles are used, then degradation rate can be matched to tissue type, but manufacturing process becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedegradation rate controlVSAvoidmanufacturing process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is manufactured using a periodic layering process where polymer solution and spacer particle suspension are alternately deposited to form repeating layers with controlled thickness and composition, enabling precise degradation rate control through systematic variation of layer parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The structure enables efficient and targeted tissue regeneration by matching the degradation rate and properties of the biocompatible layers to the specific tissue type, promoting effective bone and muscle regeneration while minimizing surgical intervention.

Implementation Method 1

Each of the polymer layers is formed with a polymer and tissue forming nanoparticles... controlled degradation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 2

sonicating the second solution to uniformly distribute the first polymer and the first tissue forming nanoparticles in the second solution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSonication: Ultrasonic Vibration

Implementation Method 3

drying the second solution on the first surface to form the first polymer film on the first surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS10238496B2Bone regeneration using biodegradable polymeric nanocomposite materials and applications of the same
Publication Date: 2019.03.26 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIV OF ARKANSAS
  • US10238496B2 patent drawing
  • US10238496B2 patent drawing
  • US10238496B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A biocompatible structure includes one or more base structures for regeneration of different tissues. Each base structure includes alternately stacked polymer layers and spacer layers. The polymer layer includes a polymer and tissue forming nanoparticles. The polymer includes polyurethane. The tissue forming nanoparticles includes hydroxypatites (HAP) nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, or nanofibers. The spacer layer includes bone particles, polymeric nanoparticles, or nanofibers. The weight percentage of tissue forming nanoparticles to the polymer in the polymer layer in one base structure is different from that in the other base structures. A method of producing the biocompatible structure includes forming multiple base structures stacked together, coating the stacked multiple base structures, and plasma treating the coated structure.