3D Printed Mold for Nanocomposite Optical Elements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional manufacturing techniques for optics are limited in producing complex shapes and surfaces, as they primarily focus on planar, convex, and concave surfaces on circularly symmetric optics, and require labor-intensive grinding and polishing processes.

Innovation Solution

The method involves 3D printing a mold with additive materials, figuring it to desired specifications, depositing and curing nanocomposite-ink within the mold, and optionally releasing the optical-element, allowing for the creation of complex optical surfaces and subsystems with integrated features like refractive-gradients and alignment features.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional grinding and polishing techniques are used, then planar, convex, and concave surfaces on circularly symmetric optics can be manufactured, but complex shapes and surfaces cannot be produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to produce complex shapes and surfacesVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical grinding and polishing systems with a combination of 3D printing technology and magnetic field-based finishing. The 3D printer creates the basic optical shape through additive manufacturing, eliminating the need for complex mechanical material removal. For surface finishing, magnetic fields are used to manipulate abrasive particles or polishing compounds, substituting mechanical contact with field-based processing. This allows complex freeform surfaces to be manufactured without the limitations of traditional mechanical tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If traditional grinding and polishing are used, then optical surfaces can be finished, but labor-intensive processes are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface finish qualityVSAvoidmanufacturing time and labor
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through automated 3D printing processes that build optical components layer by layer with precise control over geometry and surface characteristics. The system uses computer-aided design (CAD) models to directly guide the printing process, eliminating manual intervention for shape creation. Magnetic field-based finishing processes similarly operate autonomously, using programmed field patterns to achieve desired surface finishes without continuous human operation. This automation dramatically reduces both labor requirements and manufacturing time while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If 3D printing is used to create molds, then complex optical shapes can be produced, but mold release from the optical element may be difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity of optical shapesVSAvoidmold release mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs flexible mold materials that can deform elastically to release from complex optical shapes. The mold is designed as a thin-walled structure that can flex and contract during the release process, allowing it to withdraw from intricate geometries without damaging the optical element. This flexibility is achieved through careful selection of mold materials with appropriate elastic properties and designing the mold geometry to accommodate deformation during assembly and disassembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Manufacturing precision

If nanocomposite-ink is deposited and cured, then refractive gradients can be achieved, but multiple deposition and curing cycles are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefractive profile accuracyVSAvoidnumber of deposition and curing cycles
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses preliminary action by pre-programming the nanocomposite-ink deposition process to achieve the desired refractive gradient in a controlled sequence. The ink is deposited with specific spatial patterns and concentrations that pre-establish the refractive index distribution before curing. By carefully designing the deposition pattern and ink formulation, the system can achieve complex refractive profiles with fewer curing cycles, as the structural framework for the gradient is already in place before the curing process begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of optical elements with complex shapes and surfaces, reducing manufacturing time and labor, while achieving precise surface finishes and refractive profiles that correct for aberrations, making it suitable for both prototyping and volume manufacturing.

Implementation Method 1

Depositing a nanocomposite-ink into the mold. Selectively, curing the nanocomposite-ink.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerisation: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentUS9579829B2Method for manufacturing an optical element
Publication Date: 2017.02.28 VADIENT OPTICS LLC
  • US9579829B2 patent drawing
  • US9579829B2 patent drawing
  • US9579829B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method to manufacture optics and optical subsystems. In one aspect, a method to manufacture an optical-element in accordance with the present disclosure comprise the steps of: Printing at least a part of a mold with an additive manufacturing printer. Optically figuring the mold to the specifications of the desired optical-element. Printing a nanocomposite-ink into the mold. Selectively, curing the nanocomposite-ink. Repeating at least the steps of deposition of the nanocomposite-ink and selective curing, until the mold is sufficiently filled and cured. Optionally, releasing the optical-element from the mold.