g-C3N4-MoO3-MgAl2O4 Nanocomposite for High-Yield Supercapacitor Electrodes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for manufacturing carbon nanomaterials, particularly graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) and metal oxide composites, suffer from low yield, high cost, and inefficiency, limiting their application in energy storage devices like supercapacitors.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the combination of magnesium, aluminum, and molybdate salts with a carbon source in stoichiometric proportions, followed by heating and grinding steps to produce a nanocomposite of g-C3N4, MoO3, and MgAl2O4, with controlled pore distribution and specific surface area, enhancing electrical conductivity and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional methods are used to manufacture g-C3N4 and metal oxide composites, then the materials can be produced, but the yield is low and production cost is high

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveyieldVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple synthesis steps into a single one-pot solvothermal process. Magnesium salt, aluminum salt, molybdate salt, and carbon source are mixed together in one container and subjected to solvothermal treatment simultaneously, forming the nanocomposite in a single operation rather than through separate sequential steps. This merging of operations increases productivity and reduces production cost by eliminating intermediate processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent synthesizes a composite nanomaterial comprising g-C3N4, MoO3, and MgAl2O4 in a single process. The composite structure integrates multiple functional components (carbon nitride for photocatalysis, molybdenum oxide for conductivity, magnesium aluminate for stability) that work synergistically to enhance supercapacitor performance while improving manufacturing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If conventional methods are used to manufacture g-C3N4 and metal oxide composites, then the materials can be produced, but the manufacturing efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary mixing of all precursor salts and carbon source in appropriate stoichiometric ratios before the solvothermal treatment. This preliminary preparation ensures that all components are properly distributed and ready for simultaneous reaction, eliminating the need for time-consuming sequential addition steps during the main synthesis process and thereby improving manufacturing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The solvothermal process maintains continuous reaction conditions throughout the synthesis. The heated solvent continuously facilitates the formation and transformation of the nanocomposite structure without interruption, ensuring that the useful chemical reactions proceed continuously to completion rather than through intermittent batch steps, thus reducing total processing time and improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Quantity of substance

If the nanocomposite is used in supercapacitors, then charge storage capability is enhanced, but the specific surface area and pore structure must be precisely controlled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge storage capabilityVSAvoidspecific surface area control
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent controls the specific surface area and pore structure by adjusting key parameters of the solvothermal process, including reaction temperature, reaction time, solvent type and amount, and precursor concentrations. By systematically varying these parameters, the manufacturing process achieves precise control over the nanocomposite's surface area and porosity, optimizing charge storage capability while maintaining manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The nanocomposite exhibits local quality variations in its structure, with different regions having optimized properties for specific functions. The g-C3N4 provides photocatalytic active sites, MoO3 provides conductive pathways, and MgAl2O4 provides structural stability with controlled porosity. This spatial distribution of different material properties within the composite enables enhanced charge storage while maintaining precise control over overall surface area and pore structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The nanocomposite exhibits improved electrical conductivity, chemical stability, and specific surface area, leading to enhanced charge storage and discharge capabilities in supercapacitors, with high efficiency and reduced production costs.

Implementation Method 1

heating the first mixture to remove at least 99.5 percent by weight (wt. %) of the aqueous solvent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

calcining the first powder at a temperature in a range of from 600 degrees Celsius (° C.) to 800° C. for a time in a range of 2 to 4 hours (h)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 3

heating the second powder at a temperature in a range of from 550° C. to 650° C. for a time in a range of 15 minutes (min) to 1.5 h to obtain the nanocomposite, including graphitic graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Pyrolysis

Data Source

PatentUS12350655B1C<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>@MoO<sub>3</sub>/MgAI<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4 </sub>nanocomposite and method of preparation thereof
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 IMAM MOHAMMAD IBN SAUD ISLAMIC UNIV
  • US12350655B1 patent drawing
  • US12350655B1 patent drawing
  • US12350655B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of manufacturing a nanocomposite is described. The method includes combining a magnesium salt, an aluminum salt, and a molybdate salt in stoichiometric proportions within 5 mole percent (mol. %) in an aqueous solvent including a carbon source, to obtain a first mixture. The method further includes heating the first mixture to remove at least 99.5 percent by weight (wt. %) of the aqueous solvent to obtain a first solid, grinding the first solid into a first powder, calcining the first powder at a temperature of about 600° C. to 800° C. for a time of about 2 to 4 hours (h) to obtain a second solid, grinding the second solid and urea, into a second powder, heating the second powder at a temperature of about 550° C. to 650° C. for a time of about 15 minutes (min) to 1.5 h to obtain the nanocomposite.