Magnetic Nanoparticle Cell Destruction Using Alfvén Wave Deflection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for selectively destroying tumor cells are inefficient and often damage healthy tissues due to uncontrolled heat input or low nanoparticle deflection efficiency, leading to prolonged treatment times and potential harm to surrounding healthy cells.

Innovation Solution

A device utilizing a primary and secondary coil to generate inhomogeneous magnetic fields, creating Alfvén waves that deflect metallic nanoparticles attached to cell membranes, thereby effectively destroying tumor cells and other cosmetically/aesthetically relevant cell structures without causing significant harm to healthy cells.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If alternating magnetic fields are used to set nanoparticles into vibration for cell destruction, then cell destruction is achieved, but treatment time becomes excessively long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell destruction efficiencyVSAvoidtreatment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies mechanical vibration through Alfvén waves generated by two coils to set nanoparticles into intense vibration, causing cell membrane rupture. This mechanical vibration approach achieves cell destruction much faster than conventional alternating magnetic fields, directly resolving the contradiction between destruction efficiency and treatment time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the magnetic field by using two coils to generate Alfvén waves instead of simple alternating magnetic fields. This parameter change enables much faster nanoparticle deflection and cell destruction, reducing treatment time while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If simple alternating magnetic fields are used to deflect nanoparticles, then cell destruction is achieved, but destruction efficiency is too low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell destruction efficiencyVSAvoiddestruction effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses Alfvén waves to induce intense mechanical vibration in nanoparticles, achieving much higher deflection amplitudes compared to simple alternating magnetic fields. This results in reliable and efficient cell membrane rupture, simultaneously improving both destruction efficiency and effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic action through Alfvén waves that oscillate at specific frequencies to maximize nanoparticle deflection. This periodic magnetic field action enhances the mechanical stress on cell membranes, improving destruction reliability while maintaining high efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Productivity

If heat input is used to destroy tumour cells, then cell destruction is achieved, but surrounding healthy tissue is damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetumour cell destructionVSAvoiddamage to healthy tissue
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the thermal mechanism (heat input) with a mechanical mechanism (Alfvén wave-induced nanoparticle vibration). This substitution destroys tumour cells through mechanical stress on cell membranes rather than thermal damage, eliminating the harmful effect on surrounding healthy tissue while maintaining effective tumour cell destruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses nanoparticles as intermediaries that are selectively attached to tumour cells. These nanoparticles serve as mediators that convert magnetic field energy into mechanical vibration specifically at the tumour cell location, enabling precise destruction without affecting healthy surrounding tissue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If heat dissipation is used for tumour cell destruction, then cell destruction is achieved, but control precision is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetumour cell destructionVSAvoidcontrol precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces thermal control (heat dissipation) with mechanical control (Alfvén wave frequency and amplitude). The mechanical approach allows precise control of nanoparticle vibration through electromagnetic field parameters, significantly improving control precision while maintaining effective tumour cell destruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device achieves faster and more effective destruction of tumor cells and other relevant cell structures by generating Alfvén waves, allowing for shorter treatment times and minimizing damage to healthy tissues, with the option for precise control to avoid excessive tissue destruction.

Implementation Method 1

a primary coil for generating an inhomogeneous primary magnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

the nanoparticle is deflected by the primary magnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 3

deforms it periodically in order to generate Alfvén waves which deflect the nanoparticle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAlfvén waves:

Implementation Method 4

the secondary magnetic field oscillates in relation to the primary magnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field oscillation: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 5

the cell membrane of the cell structure is torn up by the nanoparticle and the cell structure is consequently destroyed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force from wave deflection: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS20230380922A1Device for destroying cell structures without damaging their surroundings
Publication Date: 2023.11.30 SIGMA-7 EU
  • US20230380922A1 patent drawing
  • US20230380922A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for environmentally friendly destruction of health-relevant and cosmetically/aesthetically relevant cell structures, in particular tumour cells, which have at least one metallic nanoparticle on their cell membrane, is disclosed. The device includes a primary coil for generating an inhomogeneous primary magnetic field, a secondary coil for generating an inhomogeneous secondary magnetic field and a control device which is designed for actuating the primary coil in such a way that the nanoparticle is deflected by the primary magnetic field and for actuating the secondary coil in such a way that the secondary magnetic field oscillates in relation to the primary magnetic field and deforms it periodically in order to generate Alfvén waves which deflect the nanoparticle, whereby the cell membrane of the cell structure is torn up by the nanoparticle and the cell structure is consequently destroyed.