Nanoparticle Monolayer Deposition via Covalent Functionalization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for depositing nanoparticles on surfaces lack robust attachment, specificity, and uniformity, especially on curved or non-uniform surfaces, and are often unstable at high temperatures or chemically unstable, making them unsuitable for various applications.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the functionalization of surfaces and nanoparticles using distinct fluids to form covalent bonds, allowing for the deposition of a single, uniform monolayer of nanoparticles through liquid phase atomic layer deposition, which can be repeated to create hierarchical structures and metamaterials with controlled optical and electrical properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional nanoparticle deposition methods are used, then deposition process is simple, but attachment robustness and uniformity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment robustnessVSAvoiddeposition process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The deposition process is segmented into distinct sequential steps: surface functionalization with first fluid, particle functionalization with second fluid, then deposition. This segmentation allows each step to be optimized independently, ensuring robust covalent attachment while maintaining process manageability through clear separation of functionalization and deposition phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Both surface and particles undergo preliminary functionalization treatment before deposition. The surface is pre-functionalized with first functional groups, and particles are pre-functionalized with second functional groups that complementarily attach to the first functional groups. This preliminary action ensures robust attachment is established before the actual deposition occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If conventional deposition methods are used, then process is faster, but monolayer uniformity and control deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonolayer uniformityVSAvoiddeposition speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The method achieves local quality control by ensuring uniform functional group distribution on both surface and particles before deposition. The complementary functional groups (first and second functional groups) create specific localized attachment sites that ensure uniform monolayer formation with consistent particle spacing and orientation across the entire surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The method controls deposition parameters including fluid concentrations, contact times, and functional group densities to achieve uniform monolayer formation. By optimizing these parameters, the process balances deposition speed with uniformity, allowing controlled formation of single-layer monolayers without aggregation or multi-layer formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If conventional deposition methods are used, then cost is lower, but chemical stability and temperature stability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical stabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The method creates a composite structure consisting of surface-functional groups-particle-functional groups covalent bonds. This composite approach uses complementary functional groups that form chemically stable covalent connections, enhancing both chemical stability and temperature stability while maintaining cost-effectiveness through the use of standard functionalization chemistry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Adaptability or versatility

If conventional deposition methods are used, then process is simpler, but adaptability to curved and non-uniform surfaces deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface geometry adaptabilityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The functionalization-deposition method is universally applicable to various surface geometries including flat, curved, and non-uniform surfaces. The liquid-phase functionalization and deposition processes conform to any surface topology, allowing the same method to be used across diverse applications without requiring geometry-specific modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method provides a stable, uniform, and cost-effective way to modify surfaces with nanoparticles, enabling the creation of novel materials with tailored properties such as UV blocking, light absorption, and enhanced solar cell efficiency, suitable for a wide range of surfaces including curved and non-uniform ones.

Implementation Method 1

functionalizing a surface with a monolayer of a first functional group by contacting a first fluid to the surface; functionalizing a first plurality of particles with a second functional group... attaching the first functional group to the second functional group

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCovalent bonding: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

generating a first electrostatic charge on a surface; generating a second electrostatic charge on a first plurality of particles in a suspension fluid, the second electrostatic charge being opposite to the first electrostatic charge; forming a monolayer of particles on the surface by contacting the suspension fluid comprising the first plurality of particles to the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic attraction: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentUS10121919B2Control of surface properties by deposition of particle monolayers
Publication Date: 2018.11.06 NANOCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US10121919B2 patent drawing
  • US10121919B2 patent drawing
  • US10121919B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The physical and chemical properties of surfaces can be controlled by bonding nanoparticles, microspheres, or nanotextures to the surface via inorganic precursors. Surfaces can acquire a variety of desirable properties such as antireflection or reflection, antifogging, antifrosting, UV blocking, and IR absorption, while maintaining transparency to visible light. Micro or nanomaterials can also be used as etching masks to texture a surface and control its physical and chemical properties via its micro or nanotexture.