Nanoparticle Classification via Inertial Impactor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for classifying nanoparticles, such as the differential mobility analyzer (DMA), face challenges in achieving high throughput and obtaining uniform-sized particles, especially for nanoparticles smaller than 10 nm, due to difficulties in charging and the low probability of successful size classification, which limits their practical application.

Innovation Solution

A particulate size classification apparatus using an impactor under low pressure, which relies on the inertia of particles rather than their charge state, with a carrier gas ejecting particles into a classifying chamber and a trapping plate to separate particles by size, allowing for high-throughput classification of nanoparticles by controlling the Stokes number and using modifications like helium gas and replaceable nozzle and trapping plate mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If differential mobility analyzer (DMA) is used for nanoparticle size classification, then uniform particle sizes can be achieved, but the throughput is very small and classification efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size uniformityVSAvoidclassification throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the electrical field-based classification mechanism of DMA with a mechanical inertial classification system using an impactor. Particles are classified based on their inertia and ability to follow gas streamlines, eliminating the need for particle charging while achieving size-based separation with much higher throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the classification parameter from electrical mobility (charge-to-size ratio) to inertial properties (Stokes number). By controlling the Stokes number through gas flow rate and particle size, the system achieves efficient classification of nanoparticles without requiring particle charging, thereby increasing throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If nanoparticles are charged for DMA classification, then size classification can be performed, but charging efficiency is very low for particles of 10 nm or less

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification effectivenessVSAvoidclassification throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the electrical charging and electrical field separation mechanism with a mechanical inertial separation system. The impactor uses gas flow dynamics and particle inertia to classify particles by size, completely eliminating the particle charging step and its associated efficiency problems for small nanoparticles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If liquid phase reaction method is used for nanoparticle production, then uniform particle sizes are obtained, but impurities from surfactants and organic solvents remain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size uniformityVSAvoidimpurity content
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a gas phase reaction environment (using gases like oxygen, nitrogen, or noble gases) instead of liquid phase with surfactants. This inert gas environment eliminates contamination from organic solvents and surfactants while maintaining the ability to produce uniform nanoparticles through controlled gas-phase reactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus effectively classifies nanoparticles with diameters of 10 nm or less with high throughput, achieving a significant increase in the amount of uniformly sized particles collected, overcoming the limitations of traditional methods by enhancing the collection efficiency of smaller nanoparticles.

Implementation Method 1

relies on the inertia of particles rather than their charge state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia: Inertia

Implementation Method 2

by controlling the Stokes number

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStokes number:

Data Source

PatentUS8118170B2Particulate size classification apparatus and method
Publication Date: 2012.02.21 FUJITSU LTD
  • US8118170B2 patent drawing
  • US8118170B2 patent drawing
  • US8118170B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Particulates called nanoparticles (principally having a diameter of 10 nm or less) are reliably and easily according to size with high throughput. An impactor includes a particulate size classifying chamber provided with an exhaust port for particulates, a nozzle ejecting to the inside of the particulate size classifying chamber a carrier gas containing particulates to be classified, and a trapping plate as particulate trapping unit provided in the particulate size classifying chamber and selectively trapping particulates ejected from the nozzle.