Nanosheet Via Layout for Dense Routing Without Gate Spacer Shorts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge of increasing metal line packing density in integrated circuits while minimizing resistance and mitigating shorting concerns in nano-sheet-based devices has become increasingly complex, particularly as feature dimensions shrink, affecting device performance and processing efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves optimizing the placement and design of gate vias and metal lines in nano-sheet-based devices, ensuring they are positioned to avoid shorting risks and maximize routing efficiency by allowing the gate vias to be placed on the active region without intruding onto gate spacers, and matching via dimensions to metal line dimensions to minimize resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If gate vias are placed on the active region to maximize routing efficiency, then routing efficiency is improved, but shorting risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting efficiencyVSAvoidshorting risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating via placement rules based on location: gate vias are permitted on the active region (providing routing efficiency) but prohibited from intruding onto gate spacers (preventing shorting). This spatial differentiation of via placement permissions resolves the contradiction between routing efficiency and shorting risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If metal line packing density is increased to improve production efficiency, then production efficiency is improved, but resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidresistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing via dimensions to match metal line dimensions, which minimizes resistance at via-metal line interfaces. This parameter optimization allows for increased metal line packing density while controlling resistance, thereby resolving the contradiction between production efficiency and resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If feature dimensions are reduced to improve production efficiency, then production efficiency is improved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by establishing clear via placement rules and dimension matching requirements before the actual manufacturing process. These pre-defined guidelines simplify the processing of reduced-featured devices by providing explicit design constraints, thereby resolving the contradiction between improved production efficiency from scaling and increased processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12354953B2Via structures
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US12354953B2 patent drawing
  • US12354953B2 patent drawing
  • US12354953B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device includes a substrate having a top surface, a fin extending lengthwise along a first direction, a source feature and a drain feature, a gate structure having a gate stack extending along a second direction perpendicular to the first direction and interposing between the source and drain features, a gate via directly disposed on the gate stack, a source via electrically connecting the source feature, and a drain via electrically connecting the drain feature. The fin includes a stack of channel layers engaged by the gate stack. The source via has a first dimension along the second direction and a second dimension along the first direction, the drain via feature has a third dimension along the second direction and a fourth dimension along the first direction. A ratio of the first dimension to the second dimension is greater than a ratio of the third dimension to the fourth dimension.