Nanostructured Carbon Electrodes Sintering Process

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing solid carbon objects with high electrical and mechanical properties are energy- and time-intensive, and often require the use of expensive nanostructured carbon materials, limiting their widespread application in industries such as electric arc furnaces and electronics.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the compression and sintering of nanostructured carbon powders, such as carbon nanotubes, to form cohesive bodies with covalent bonds, eliminating the need for binders and reducing production costs while enhancing electrical and mechanical properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional multi-step processes including mixing, extruding, pyrolyzing, and sintering are used to produce electrodes, then electrical and mechanical properties are improved, but production time and energy consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical and mechanical propertiesVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple conventional processing steps (mixing, extruding, pyrolyzing, and sintering) into a single integrated sintering process. The green strength provided by the binder allows the compacted shape to be maintained through processing, enabling direct sintering of carbon powder without separate extrusion and pyrolysis steps, thereby significantly reducing production time while maintaining electrode properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The binder is added to the carbon powder before sintering to provide green strength, allowing the powder to be compacted into a stable shape that can withstand subsequent processing. This preliminary binding action eliminates the need for separate extrusion and pyrolysis steps, streamlining the manufacturing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If conventional multi-step processes including mixing, extruding, pyrolyzing, and sintering are used to produce electrodes, then electrical and mechanical properties are improved, but energy consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical and mechanical propertiesVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple conventional processing steps (mixing, extruding, pyrolyzing, and sintering) into a single integrated sintering process. This consolidation eliminates the need for separate high-energy pyrolysis and extrusion steps, reducing total energy consumption while still achieving the desired electrode properties through the combined process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If expensive nanostructured carbon materials are used, then electrical and mechanical properties are improved, but production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical and mechanical propertiesVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state and bonding parameters of carbon powder through controlled sintering. By heating the carbon powder to sintering temperatures, covalent bonds form between particles, creating a cohesive structure with high mechanical strength and electrical conductivity. This approach uses ordinary carbon powder transformed by parameter changes rather than expensive nanostructured materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical binding (using binders to hold particles together) with chemical bonding (covalent bonds formed during sintering). This substitution eliminates the need for expensive binder materials and the complex mixing and extrusion processes, reducing production costs while improving electrical conductivity by creating direct particle-to-particle contact through covalent bonding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Strength

If binders are used in conventional processes, then green strength is improved, but electrical conductivity and purity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegreen strengthVSAvoidelectrical conductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The binder is used temporarily to provide green strength during compaction and processing, then discarded through combustion during the sintering process. The binder burns off, leaving no residual material to interfere with electrical conductivity, while the covalent bonds formed between carbon particles during sintering provide the final structural integrity. This temporary use and subsequent removal of the binder resolves the contradiction between needing green strength and maintaining electrical conductivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical binding (binders holding particles together) with chemical bonding (covalent bonds formed during sintering). The binder provides only temporary green strength during processing, then is completely consumed during sintering, leaving no non-conductive residue. The final structural integrity and electrical conductivity are achieved through direct covalent bonding between carbon particles, eliminating the trade-off between green strength and electrical conductivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method produces solid carbon objects with improved strength, thermal conductivity, and electrical conductivity, suitable for applications like electrodes, capacitors, and batteries, while being more cost-effective and easier to manufacture.

Implementation Method 1

The sintering process forms covalent bonds between at least some of the carbon nanotubes at their contact points

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCovalent bonding: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

densifying the confined mass to form a cohesive body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 3

Carbon nanotubes are known to have high electrical conductivity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 4

The sintering process forms covalent bonds between at least some of the carbon nanotubes at their contact points

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentEP3129321B1Electrodes comprising nanostructured carbon
Publication Date: 2021.09.29 SEERSTONE LLC
  • EP3129321B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3129321B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3129321B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

An electrode includes a network of compressed interconnected nanostructured carbon particles such as carbon nanotubes. Some nanostructured carbon particles of the network are in electrical contact with adjacent nanostructured carbon particles. Electrodes may be used in various devices, such as capacitors, electric arc furnaces, batteries, etc. A method of producing an electrode includes confining a mass of nanostructured carbon particles and densifying the confined mass of nanostructured carbon particles to form a cohesive body with sufficient contacts between adjacent nanostructured carbon particles to provide an electrical path between at least two remote points of the cohesive body. The electrodes may be sintered to induce covalent bonding between the nanostructured carbon particles at contact points to further enhance the mechanical and electrical properties of the electrodes.