Nanostructured Electrodes With Spark-Ablated Nanoparticles for SOECs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) face limitations in achieving high efficiency and scalability due to sub-optimal microstructured materials and a lack of understanding in CO2 and H2O conversion catalysts, which hinders large-scale renewable energy storage and integration of intermittent renewable energy sources.

Innovation Solution

The development of nanostructured electrodes using spark ablation to produce nanoparticles with precise size control and tunable distributions, specifically for SOECs, combining materials like yttrium-stabilized zirconia (YSZ), nickel, and stainless steel, enhances catalytic activity and reduces triple phase boundary resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional microstructured materials are used in SOECs, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but catalytic activity and current density remain sub-optimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent densityVSAvoidnanoparticle size control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling nanoparticle size (2-20 nm) and size distribution (standard deviation 0.1-1.0 nm) through spark ablation process parameters such as pulse duration, power, and carrier gas flow rate. This enables optimization of catalytic activity and current density while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through a scalable deposition process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials by combining different metal nanoparticles (e.g., Ni, Cu, Pt, Pd, Ag, Au, Al, Zn, In, Ga, Sn, Pb, Bi, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, As, Se, Te, Sr, Ba, Hf, Ta, W, Re, Os, Ir, Pt, Au, Ag, Pd, Al, Ga, In, Tl, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, Ac, Th, Pa, U, Np, Pu, Am, Cm, Bk, Cf, Es, Fm, Md, No, Lr) with support materials to create nanostructured electrodes with enhanced catalytic activity and controlled electrical properties for improved SOEC performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If nanoparticle size is reduced to enhance catalytic activity, then triple phase boundary resistance decreases, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic efficiencyVSAvoidparticle size distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by monitoring and adjusting spark ablation process parameters (pulse duration, power, carrier gas flow) to achieve and maintain the target nanoparticle size range (2-20 nm) with controlled standard deviation (0.1-1.0 nm). This feedback mechanism ensures consistent catalytic efficiency while managing manufacturing precision requirements through process optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If spark ablation is used to produce nanostructured electrodes, then catalytic activity and current density improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrolysis efficiencyVSAvoidnanoparticle deposition system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical nanoparticle fabrication and handling systems with a spark ablation deposition system that directly generates and deposits nanoparticles in a single integrated process. This substitution of mechanical systems with electrical discharge-based synthesis simplifies the overall device architecture while achieving the desired nanostructured electrode morphology and composition for enhanced electrolysis efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If precise nanoparticle size control is implemented, then CO2 and H2O conversion efficiency improves, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes conversion efficiency by controlling nanoparticle size parameters (2-20 nm with standard deviation 0.1-1.0 nm) through adjustable spark ablation parameters. The process maintains manufacturing scalability by using a deposition technique that can be applied to large surface areas and by selecting from a wide range of metal materials that can be ablated using the same fundamental process, thereby balancing precision with ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly improves current density and efficiency in SOECs, enabling more effective CO2 and H2O conversion, and when applied to water descaling and electrochemical desalination, reduces energy requirements and material needs, making the technology more viable for large-scale renewable energy storage and water treatment.

Implementation Method 1

The method of spark ablation is used to deposit nanoparticles of conductive material onto a conductive electrode support

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical discharge: Electric Spark

Implementation Method 2

The method of spark ablation is used to deposit nanoparticles of conductive material onto a conductive electrode support

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAblation: Ablation

Implementation Method 3

nanoparticles of conductive material deposited on a conductive electrode support

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical vapor deposition: Physical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS20240426002A1Nanostructured electrodes
Publication Date: 2024.12.26 TECHNION RES & DEV FOUND LTD
  • US20240426002A1 patent drawing
  • US20240426002A1 patent drawing
  • US20240426002A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Nanostructured electrodes comprising nanoparticles of conductive material deposited on a conductive electrode support are described in the present invention. Said nanoparticles are characterised by a particle size of about 20.0 nm or less and a particle size distribution having a tuneable standard deviation from ±0.1 nm to ±1.0 nm. This particle size distribution is measured using a differential mobility analyser. The nanostructured electrodes are manufactured by the method of spark ablation, which provides a scalable and viable way for producing widely different types of mixed nanoparticles. Most importantly, implementation of the spark ablation has the great advantage to combine a wider range of materials, thereby allowing the synthesis of mixed nanoparticles with virtually unlimited combinations and highly sharp particle size distribution control which is advantageous for high tunability of selectivity.