Naphtha Cracking Feed Segmentation for Olefin Yield

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

It is challenging to achieve high selectivity for ethylene and propylene production in naphtha cracking while maintaining high conversion, as heavier olefins with six or more carbon atoms are produced, which are less valuable and require significant processing to separate di-olefins from mono-olefins, leading to inefficiencies in ethylene and propylene yields.

Innovation Solution

A process that involves passing a hydrocarbon stream through a first separation unit to generate a light and heavy stream, where the heavy stream is treated to remove sulfur and nitrogen compounds, and then further separated to produce a stream rich in normal hydrocarbons, which is then cracked to produce light olefins, while the non-normal components are sent to a reforming unit to enhance aromatics production, using a combination of steam cracking or catalytic naphtha cracking and continuous catalytic reforming units.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional naphtha cracking is used to produce light olefins, then ethylene and propylene are produced, but heavier olefins with six or more carbon atoms are also produced which require significant processing and reduce overall yield efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight olefin yieldVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The naphtha feedstream is divided into two distinct streams based on boiling point: a light naphtha stream (C5-C6 components) and a heavy naphtha stream (C7+ components). The light naphtha stream is directed to the catalytic cracker optimized for light olefin production, while the heavy naphtha stream is sent to the reformer. This segmentation prevents heavier components from entering the cracker and being converted into less valuable heavier olefins, thereby improving light olefin yield and simplifying downstream processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The heavier naphtha components (C7 and above) are extracted and removed from the feedstream before it enters the catalytic cracker. This is achieved through a fractionation column that separates the light naphtha (C5-C6) from the heavy naphtha (C7+). By taking out the heavy components and directing them to the reformer instead, the cracker is fed with optimized light naphtha that produces higher yields of light olefins with minimal formation of heavier olefins requiring complex separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Manufacturing precision

If a single cracker processes all naphtha components, then all components are converted, but selectivity for light olefins decreases due to formation of heavier olefins

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveolefin selectivityVSAvoidconversion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The processing system is segmented into two parallel pathways: a catalytic cracking unit for the light naphtha stream optimized for light olefin selectivity, and a reforming unit for the heavy naphtha stream. This segmentation allows each unit to operate at optimal conditions for its specific feed composition, maintaining high light olefin selectivity in the cracker while still achieving high overall conversion through the reforming pathway.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different processing conditions and catalysts are applied locally to different feed streams: the light naphtha stream receives catalytic cracking conditions with zeolite catalysts optimized for light olefin production, while the heavy naphtha stream receives reforming conditions with bifunctional catalysts. This local optimization of processing quality for each stream type maximizes light olefin selectivity from the cracker while maintaining high overall conversion efficiency through the reformer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process optimizes the yields of light olefins and aromatics by controlling the feedstream composition, increasing light olefin production and aromatics conversion without altering the flow rates to the processing units, thereby improving overall ethylene and propylene yields and reducing processing complexities.

Implementation Method 1

Steam cracking or pyrolysis of hydrocarbons produces essentially all of the ethylene and propylene

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

The raffinate stream is passed to a reforming unit to generate a reformate process stream comprising aromatics

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

The first heavy stream is passed to a hydrotreating unit to remove residual sulfur compounds and nitrogen compounds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrotreating: Hydrogenation

Data Source

PatentEP3004291B1Naphtha cracking
Publication Date: 2019.02.06 UOP LLC
  • EP3004291B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

A process for increasing the yields of light olefins and the yields of aromatics from a hydrocarbon stream is presented. The process includes a first separation to direct the light components that are not reformable to a cracking unit, with the remainder passed to a second separation unit. The second separation unit extracts normal components from the hydrocarbon stream to pass to the cracking unit. The resulting hydrocarbon stream with reduced light ends and reduced normals is passed to a reforming unit.