Selective Naphtha Reforming Catalyst Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional naphtha reforming processes are inefficient in upgrading hydrocarbon streams containing both light C4-C5 hydrocarbons and C6+ components, as they fail to selectively convert paraffins to aromatics, leading to low aromatics yields and high vapor pressures, which do not meet government specifications for liquid transportation fuels.

Innovation Solution

The process involves using two structurally distinct reforming catalysts to selectively reform discrete sub-components of the hydrocarbon feedstock, with a first catalyst converting naphthenes to aromatics while minimizing paraffin conversion, and a second catalyst dehydrogenating paraffins to produce olefins, thereby increasing the octane rating and decreasing vapor pressure of the reformate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional naphtha reforming is used to upgrade hydrocarbon streams, then naphthenes are converted to aromatics, but paraffins are not selectively converted to aromatics, resulting in low aromatics yields

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearomatics yieldVSAvoidselectivity of paraffin conversion
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The hydrocarbon feedstock is separated into discrete fractions based on their chemical composition (paraffins, naphthenes, aromatics), and each fraction is treated with a specifically designed catalyst. This segmentation allows each catalyst to be optimized for its target substrate, achieving high selectivity and aromatics yield without the limitations of treating the entire feedstock uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different catalysts with specific properties are applied to different feedstock fractions. Paraffin-rich fractions receive catalysts optimized for paraffin aromatization, while naphthene-rich fractions receive catalysts optimized for naphthene conversion. This local quality approach ensures each catalyst operates under optimal conditions for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If conventional naphtha reforming is used, then some upgrading occurs, but vapor pressure remains high and octane rating is insufficient for transportation fuel specifications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct quality (octane rating and vapor pressure)VSAvoidreforming efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the feedstock into separate fractions and treating them with specialized catalysts, the process achieves more complete and selective conversion to high-value products. This segmentation enables better control over product distribution, ensuring the final reformate meets transportation fuel specifications with higher efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The process modifies key parameters including temperature, pressure, hydrogen-to-hydrocarbon ratio, and catalyst composition to optimize the conversion of both paraffins and naphthenes. These parameter changes enable simultaneous improvement of octane rating and vapor pressure control, achieving product quality that meets fuel specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If light C4-C5 hydrocarbons are included in the feedstock, then feedstock utilization increases, but these paraffins cannot form aromatics in conventional reformers, reducing overall efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedstock rangeVSAvoidreforming efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The catalytic system is designed to handle multiple hydrocarbon types (paraffins, naphthenes, aromatics) across different carbon ranges (C4-C12) through a series of specialized catalysts. This multi-functional approach allows the process to universally upgrade various feedstock components while maintaining high efficiency, making light hydrocarbons a viable feedstock option.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The feedstock is segmented by carbon number and chemical composition, with separate catalysts applied to different fractions. This allows light C4-C5 paraffins to be treated with catalysts optimized for their specific conversion, while heavier components receive appropriate treatment, maintaining overall reforming efficiency across the entire feedstock range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Quantity of substance

If a single reforming catalyst is used for the entire feedstock, then device complexity is reduced, but selectivity and aromatics yield are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearomatics yieldVSAvoidnumber of catalysts
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process uses multiple catalysts, each designed for specific functions (paraffin aromatization, naphthene conversion, etc.). While this increases device complexity, the segmentation of feedstock and targeted catalysis achieves significantly higher aromatics yield and selectivity, justifying the additional complexity through improved product quality and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach increases the yield of high-octane, low-vapor-pressure liquid hydrocarbons suitable for transportation fuels and reduces catalyst coking and deactivation rates, improving the overall efficiency and product quality of the reforming process.

Implementation Method 1

contacting the hydrocarbon feedstock with a first reforming catalyst at a temperature in the range from 800 °F (454 °C) to 1100 °F (593 °C), a pressure in the range from 3 bar to 30 bar and a hydrogen to hydrocarbon molar ratio from 2:1 to 15:1 that facilitates the catalytic aromatization of naphthenes in the hydrocarbon feedstock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

combining the second fraction with a second reforming catalyst at a temperature in the range from 750 °F (399 °C) to about 1250 °F (677 °C), a pressure in the range from 1 bar to 34.5 bar, a hydrogen to hydrocarbon molar ratio within the range from 0 to 1, a molar water to hydrocarbon ratio in the range from 0.1 : 1 to 10: 1

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentEP3672726B1Processes for selective naphtha reforming
Publication Date: 2024.07.31 PHILLIPS 66 CO
  • EP3672726B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3672726B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3672726B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Processes for reforming a hydrocarbon feedstock by selectively reforming different subcomponents or fractions of the feedstock using at least two compositionally-distinct reforming catalysts. Advantages may include a decreased rate of reforming catalyst deactivation and an increased yield of a liquid hydrocarbon reformate product that is characterized by at least one of an increased octane rating and a decreased vapor pressure (relative to conventional one-step reforming processes and systems).