Sanitary Napkin Elastic Modulus Ratio for Body Fit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing disposable absorbent articles, such as sanitary napkins, often fail to provide a reliable and comfortable body fit due to inadequate deformation mechanisms, which can lead to poor fluid handling and increased leakage.

Innovation Solution

A sanitary napkin design featuring a fluid-permeable facing layer with a higher elastic modulus than the absorbent core, joined to a fluid-impermeable backsheet, allowing for upward deformation upon lateral compression, thereby enhancing body fit and fluid handling performance without additional costly components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If a deformation element is added to achieve convex upward configuration, then body fit is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvex upward configurationVSAvoiddeformation element
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameters of the existing layers by selecting a topsheet with specific elastic modulus (0.1-10 kPa) and absorbent core with different elastic modulus (0.01-1.0 kPa), allowing the structure to deform convex upward through material property optimization rather than adding deformation elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent removes the need for separate deformation elements by extracting the deformation function into the material properties of the existing topsheet and absorbent core layers, achieving the same effect with simpler structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Shape

If adhesive spots and grooves are carefully arranged to achieve inverted U-shape, then body fit is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinverted U-shapeVSAvoidadhesive arrangement
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves inverted U-shape deformation through material parameter optimization (elastic modulus ratios) rather than complex adhesive patterns or grooves, simplifying manufacturing while maintaining the desired shape

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Shape

If elastically stretchable members are used to produce convex deformation, then body fit is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvex deformationVSAvoidstretchable members
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves convex deformation through optimized elastic modulus parameters of standard materials rather than expensive elastically stretchable members, reducing manufacturing cost while maintaining effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses inexpensive, disposable material combinations (topsheet and absorbent core with specific elastic moduli) to achieve the deformation effect, avoiding costly specialized components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Shape

If W-shaped geometry is achieved through crease lines, then body fit is improved, but reliability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveW-shapeVSAvoidbody fit consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves reliable body fit through material parameter optimization (elastic modulus relationships) that naturally produces consistent deformation, eliminating the unreliability of crease-line-dependent W-shape formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves improved comfort and fluid handling by ensuring the absorbent core and facing layer deform as a unit, providing close body contact and reducing leakage, while maintaining economic manufacturing simplicity.

Implementation Method 1

at equal strain from about 1% to about 5% the first elastic modulus is greater than the second elastic modulus

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS7819852B2Sanitary napkin for clean body benefit
Publication Date: 2010.10.26 PROCTER & GAMBLE CO
  • US7819852B2 patent drawing
  • US7819852B2 patent drawing
  • US7819852B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An absorbent article capable of reliably achieving an improved body-fitting profile. The absorbent article includes a fluid permeable facing layer having a first elastic modulus and an absorbent core joined to the facing layer, the absorbent core having a second elastic modulus, wherein at equal strain from about 1% to about 5% the first elastic modulus is greater than the second elastic modulus, and a fluid impermeable backsheet joined to the facing layer.