Narrow Monorail Exercise Machine for Safe Mounting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional Pilates apparatuses lack stability and safety during exerciser mounting and dismounting, with wide parallel rails creating hazardous areas and potential for injury, and they do not provide a secure enclosure for resistance mechanisms or control systems.

Innovation Solution

A monorail system with a narrow rail structure, either two closely linked rails or a singular rail, that reduces the overall width of the exercise machine, allowing for easier mounting and dismounting and incorporating bias members or resistance mechanisms within a centralized support housing to minimize exposure to hazardous areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If wide parallel rails are used to support the slidable carriage, then the exercise machine provides structural stability, but it creates hazardous areas and increases the risk of injury during mounting and dismounting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidinjury risk during mounting and dismounting
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The wide rail structure is segmented into two separate narrow rails that are positioned closer together. This segmentation maintains the structural support function while eliminating the hazardous wide gap that caused injury risks during mounting and dismounting operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hazardous function (wide spacing creating injury risk) is extracted from the rail system. The rails are repositioned to be closer together, removing the dangerous wide gap while preserving the essential support function for the slidable carriage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Adaptability or versatility

If wide parallel rails are used to accommodate multiple resistance springs, then the exercise machine provides functional versatility, but it increases the overall width and creates unsafe zones

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional versatility for resistance exercisesVSAvoidoverall width of the exercise machine
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The resistance spring arrangement is transitioned from a horizontal wide-spacing configuration to a vertical stacking configuration. This dimensional change allows multiple springs to be accommodated within a narrow horizontal space, maintaining functional versatility while reducing the overall width and eliminating unsafe zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple resistance springs are nested vertically within the same horizontal space between the narrow rails. This nesting arrangement allows multiple springs to occupy the same lateral footprint, reducing the overall width while maintaining the ability to provide various resistance levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the slidable carriage is positioned on wide parallel rails, then the exercise machine allows for resistance spring installation, but it requires exercisers to traverse the perimeter structure creating safety hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance spring installation capabilityVSAvoidmounting and dismounting ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The wide rail structure is divided into two narrow rails positioned closer together. This segmentation allows resistance springs to be installed between the rails while significantly reducing the horizontal distance exercisers must traverse, thereby improving safety and ease of mounting and dismounting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Strength

If traditional parallel rail configuration is used, then the exercise machine provides structural support, but it creates additional points of contact that may result in injury

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural support capabilityVSAvoidinjury from rail contact
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The two narrow rails are positioned so close together that they function as a unified support structure. This merging approach maintains the necessary structural support capability while eliminating the wide gaps and multiple contact points that created injury hazards in traditional configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11712613B2Exercise machine rail system
Publication Date: 2023.08.01 LAGREE TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11712613B2 patent drawing
  • US11712613B2 patent drawing
  • US11712613B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An exercise machine rail system for improved exerciser mounting and dismounting, improved functional ergonomics, and reduced risk of exerciser injury when using an exercise machine. The exercise machine rail system generally includes either two rails in close relationship which are linked together via connectors or a singular rail. Bias members are disclosed as either extending along either outer side of the rails, internally to the rail, or underneath the rail. Due to the narrow nature of the rails used by the present invention, an exerciser is able to mount and dismount the exercise machine easily and efficiently.