Universal Connector Parallel Backup for NAS File Batching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for managing backups in network attached storage (NAS) face inefficiencies in handling large numbers of files, frequent backups, incremental backups, and multiple protocols, leading to suboptimal performance and resource utilization.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a universal connector that provides multi-threaded, protocol-agnostic data storage management, enabling batching of small files, incremental metadata processing, feedback-based batching based on resource availability, parallel processing of large folders, intelligent caching, and block-based incremental backups to optimize network bandwidth and resource utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a backup system processes files sequentially in NAS, then the system complexity remains low, but the backup time and productivity deteriorate significantly when handling large numbers of files

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackup speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The backup system segments the file system into multiple volumes or partitions and processes them in parallel using multiple threads. Each thread handles a specific segment independently, enabling concurrent backup operations that significantly reduce total backup time while managing complexity through structured division of work.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from sequential single-threaded processing to multi-threaded parallel processing, adding the dimension of concurrency. This allows multiple backup operations to execute simultaneously, improving productivity from a linear time complexity to a parallel time complexity model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the backup system performs frequent full backups, then data reliability is improved, but resource consumption and data generation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata protectionVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification of changed files by comparing metadata (timestamps, sizes, checksums) before initiating backup. This preliminary action filters out unchanged files, allowing the backup system to focus resources only on actual changes rather than transferring all data repeatedly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts only the necessary changed files and blocks for backup instead of transferring entire folders or all files. By identifying and isolating only the modified portions, the system reduces data generation and network bandwidth consumption while maintaining reliable backup of actual changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Productivity

If the backup system processes small files individually, then processing precision is maintained, but the number of roundtrips and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackup efficiencyVSAvoidnumber of roundtrips
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple small file operations into batch requests. Instead of processing files one at a time with separate system calls, the backup system aggregates file operations into single requests that can be handled in parallel, reducing the total number of roundtrips to the NAS while maintaining accurate processing of each file.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the backup system uses protocol-specific handling, then adaptability to different protocols is maintained, but device complexity and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotocol supportVSAvoidimplementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The backup system implements a universal connector that provides a common interface for multiple storage protocols (SMB, NFS, AFP, etc.). This universal layer abstracts protocol differences, allowing the same backup logic to work across different protocols without requiring separate specialized handlers for each, thereby reducing implementation complexity while maintaining broad adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12061523B2System and method for parallelization backup of a folder including a large set of files stored in a network attached storage
Publication Date: 2024.08.13 DELL PROD LP
  • US12061523B2 patent drawing
  • US12061523B2 patent drawing
  • US12061523B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for managing data include obtaining, by a universal connector, a backup request for a set of files, in response to the backup request: performing a batching of file read requests for data associated with the set of files to obtain a set of file read batches, sending the set of file read batches to a network attached storage (NAS) server, obtaining a response for each of the set of file read batches from the NAS server, wherein the response for each of the set of file read batches comprise a portion of the data, wherein at least two responses for the set of file read batches are obtained in parallel, writing the portion of the data to a backup container in parallel with the obtaining, and initiating a backup of the set of files using the backup container after the writing is completed.