Native App UI Interaction Capture via Frame Bundle Extraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for capturing and evaluating user interactions with native application interfaces are inefficient, often requiring significant bandwidth and memory resources, and fail to provide effective tools for modifying interfaces to improve user experience.

Innovation Solution

The method involves generating and transmitting frame bundles that include data on the presentation position and drawing operations of user interface objects, allowing for the recreation of visual changes and user interactions, with instrumentation code using an offscreen PDF drawing context to reduce data transmission and storage needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If screenshots or video are transmitted to capture user interactions, then visual data is captured, but bandwidth and memory resources are significantly consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual data captureVSAvoidbandwidth and memory resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential visual information (drawing operations, presentation positions, and visual attribute changes) from the complete screenshot or video data. Instead of transmitting entire frame images, it transmits only the differential drawing operations that caused visual changes, significantly reducing data volume while preserving the ability to reconstruct and analyze user interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of capturing complete visual frames and then analyzing changes, the patent inverts the approach by capturing only the drawing operations and visual attribute changes directly from the rendering pipeline. This allows reconstruction of visual changes without ever creating or transmitting full screenshots, fundamentally reducing the data capture methodology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Measurement precision

If complete user session data is captured for evaluation, then interaction analysis is thorough, but data processing and storage complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteraction analysisVSAvoiddata processing and storage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential elements needed for interaction analysis: drawing operations, presentation positions, and visual attribute changes. By filtering out redundant information (such as unchanged UI elements and unnecessary metadata), the patent reduces data processing complexity while maintaining sufficient detail for thorough interaction evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments user session data into discrete, manageable units (individual drawing operations and visual attribute changes) that can be processed and stored independently. This segmentation allows for efficient indexing, querying, and analysis of specific interaction events without requiring processing of entire session recordings, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If detailed drawing operation data is stored, then interface recreation is accurate, but storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface recreation accuracyVSAvoidstorage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a simplified copy of the visual interface state by recording drawing operations and visual attribute changes rather than storing complete interface snapshots. This copy contains sufficient information to accurately recreate the interface visual changes while occupying minimal storage space, as it only captures the essential transformation data needed for reconstruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent stores changes in visual parameters (position, size, color, opacity) rather than complete parameter sets for each UI element. By recording only the delta changes in these parameters between states, the system maintains high interface recreation accuracy while significantly reducing the storage requirements compared to storing complete interface state descriptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3776193B1Capturing and processing interactions with a user interface of a native application
Publication Date: 2023.10.25 FULLSTORY INC
  • EP3776193B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3776193B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3776193B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for evaluating interactions with a user interface of an application are disclosed. In one aspect, a method includes receiving frame bundles for a user session with a native application. Each frame bundle can include data specifying, for each of one or more points in time, a presentation position of each presentation object used by the native application to generate a user interface of the native application at the point in time, and, for one or more presentation objects, one or more drawing operations performed to generate the visual representation of the presentation object. Playback data that presents visual changes of the user interface corresponding to the drawing operations performed to generate the visual representation of each presentation object is generated based on the data specified by the frame bundles.