Natural Language Guidance for Cloud Anomaly Detection Workflows

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems lack effective methods for monitoring and detecting anomalies in cloud environments, particularly in datacenters, which can be indicative of malicious activities or misconfigurations, leading to potential security breaches and operational inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A data platform is employed to monitor cloud environments, utilizing agents to collect data from compute assets, construct polygraphs to model behaviors, and detect deviations from established baselines, enabling real-time anomaly detection and reporting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If agents collect data from compute assets and construct polygraphs to model behaviors, then anomaly detection capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the cloud environment into multiple compute assets, each monitored by individual agents that collect local data independently. These segmented data points are then aggregated to form comprehensive polygraphs, allowing complex anomaly detection to be achieved through modular, manageable components rather than a monolithic complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Polygraphs serve as an intermediary data structure between raw agent-collected data and anomaly detection algorithms. They model expected behaviors as intermediaries, allowing the system to compare actual behavior against established patterns without directly processing raw complex data streams, thus simplifying the detection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system monitors cloud environments in real-time to detect anomalies, then security protection is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity protectionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic sampling and batch processing of data rather than continuous real-time analysis. Agents collect data at intervals and construct polygraphs periodically, allowing the system to maintain security monitoring while reducing computational energy consumption through less frequent processing cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The polygraph model enables the system to self-compare actual behavior against expected patterns autonomously. This self-service approach allows anomaly detection without requiring constant external computational resources or human intervention, reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining continuous security protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12355793B1Guided interactions with a natural language interface
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 FORTINET INC
  • US12355793B1 patent drawing
  • US12355793B1 patent drawing
  • US12355793B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Guided interactions with a natural language interface, including: gathering data describing one or more user interactions with a system configured for monitoring a cloud deployment; generating, based on the data, a prompt comprising one or more natural language inputs for a workflow, wherein each of the one or more natural language inputs corresponds to a query for information related to the cloud deployment; and providing a selected natural language input to a natural language interface of the anomaly detection framework.