Natural Language Interface for Consistent Application Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional software deployment methods are prone to human errors, time-consuming, and lack automated decision-making, leading to inconsistencies and downtime.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method utilizing a natural language interface to process user queries, identify intent, and generate responses for automated management of application deployment, including a system with components like CI/CD systems, deployment management, and a communications platform with NLP and query processing engines to analyze changes and impacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual deployment scripts or runbooks are used, then deployment control and monitoring are possible, but human errors occur and deployment inconsistencies arise across different environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment consistencyVSAvoidmanual intervention level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The deployment system performs self-validation through automated checks of deployment manifests, resource definitions, and configuration files. The system automatically detects inconsistencies, validates syntax, and ensures compliance with deployment policies without requiring manual verification, thereby eliminating human errors while maintaining deployment control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical deployment processes are replaced with automated computational systems that use algorithms to validate deployment configurations, check resource definitions, and monitor deployment status. This substitution eliminates human intervention errors while maintaining the ability to control and monitor deployments through automated feedback mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If sequential multi-stage deployment process is followed, then thorough validation and testing are achieved, but the process becomes time-consuming and causes downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation thoroughnessVSAvoiddeployment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation of deployment manifests, resource definitions, and configuration files before actual deployment begins. By checking for syntax errors, policy compliance, and resource availability in advance, the system prevents deployment failures and reduces the need for iterative testing, thereby maintaining validation thoroughness while minimizing deployment time and downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The deployment system maintains continuous validation and monitoring throughout the deployment process rather than performing discrete sequential checks. Automated background processes continuously verify deployment status, resource availability, and configuration integrity, enabling parallel processing that reduces overall deployment time while maintaining thorough validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual deployment processes are used, then flexibility in handling complex scenarios is maintained, but automated decision-making and agility are hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling flexibilityVSAvoiddeployment agility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses configurable parameters and policies that can be adjusted to handle different deployment scenarios and complexity levels. By changing parameters such as validation strictness, approval thresholds, and resource allocation rules, the system maintains flexibility in handling complex scenarios while enabling automated decision-making through policy-based rules that improve deployment agility and reduce manual intervention requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250298828A1Natural language interface
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 DISH NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PTE LTD
  • US20250298828A1 patent drawing
  • US20250298828A1 patent drawing
  • US20250298828A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, devices, and methods related to automated management of deployment of applications are provided. An example computer system includes one or more processors and a computer-readable storage media storing computer-executable instructions. The instructions when executed by the one or more processors, cause the computer system to receive a query in natural language from a user, and the query specifies at least one change in resources associated with deployment of an application in a target environment. The instructions when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the computer system to process the query to identify user intent from the query and identify entities related to the at least one change from the query, generate a natural language response to the user query, and output the natural language response to the user. The natural language response includes data associated with the change.