Natural Toothpaste Composition for Sonic Toothbrush Foaming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing toothpastes are not suitable for sonic toothbrushes due to inappropriate foaming properties, high abrasiveness, and complexity in composition, leading to ineffective cleaning and potential micro-damage, while many contain multiple active ingredients that complicate manufacturing and increase costs.

Innovation Solution

A toothpaste designed for sonic toothbrushes comprising hydroxyapatite, hydrated silica, and combinations of natural extracts like white pearl and sea salt, garlic and parsley, or rose and viola with lavender, along with a mild surfactant, to achieve low abrasiveness, effective cleaning, and specific oral health benefits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If traditional toothpastes with sodium lauryl sulfate are used, then aerated foam is formed with large bubbles, but the foam has low content of active ingredients and makes it difficult for active ingredients to reach tight spaces between teeth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent of active ingredients in foamVSAvoidability to reach tight spaces between teeth
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the foaming parameters by replacing sodium lauryl sulfate with alternative surfactants (sodium lauroyl sarcosinate, sodium methyl cocoyl taurate, or cocamidopropyl betaine) and adjusting the ratio of abrasive material to surfactant. This produces a foam with smaller bubbles and higher active ingredient content that can penetrate tight spaces between teeth effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If commercially available toothpastes for manual toothbrushes are used, then cleaning action is provided, but the abrasiveness is too high which can cause micro-damages when used with sonic toothbrushes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning effectivenessVSAvoidmicro-damages to teeth
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces abrasiveness by adjusting the particle size distribution of abrasive material (combining fine particles 0.01-0.5 μm with medium particles 0.5-2 μm) and controlling the total abrasive material content within specific ranges. This maintains cleaning effectiveness while preventing micro-damages to tooth enamel when used with sonic toothbrushes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite abrasive system combining multiple abrasive materials (hydrated silica, silicon dioxide, calcium carbonate, and natural abrasives like white pearl extract or sea salt) with different particle sizes and properties. This composite approach provides balanced abrasion for effective cleaning without excessive harshness that could cause micro-damages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If toothpastes with multiple active ingredients are used, then various oral health problems are prevented, but the manufacture becomes complicated and production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of oral health problemsVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent selects active ingredients that perform multiple functions simultaneously. For example, hydroxyapatite serves as both a remineralizing agent and a mild abrasive; hydrated silica provides abrasion and thickening; and natural extracts like white pearl, sea salt, garlic, parsley, rose, viola, or lavender provide antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and whitening effects. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate ingredients for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the concentration ranges of active ingredients to achieve effective oral health protection with minimal quantities. By carefully controlling the amounts of hydroxyapatite (1-10%), abrasive material (15-25%), thickening agent (0.50-1.0%), and natural extracts (0.01-1%), the formulation achieves multiple health benefits while maintaining manufacturing simplicity and cost-effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The toothpaste provides gentle cleaning, reduces plaque formation, remineralizes teeth, and alleviates hypersensitivity, while maintaining effective foaming and distribution of active ingredients, suitable for sonic toothbrushes without causing micro-damage.

Implementation Method 1

an abrasive material; hydroxyapatite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Implementation Method 2

a mild surfactant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurfactant: Surfactant

Implementation Method 3

remineralizes teeth

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeposition (physical): Deposition (physical)

Data Source

PatentEP4640201A1Natural toothpaste, especially for sonic toothbrushes
Publication Date: 2025.10.29 UNIV MEDYCZNY W ODZI
  • EP4640201A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4640201A1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2c
  • EP4640201A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The subject matter of the invention is a toothpaste, especially for sonic toothbrushes, comprising: - a solvent; - an abrasive material; - a thickening agent; - hydroxyapatite; and - one of the combinations of ingredients selected from among: - garlic extract and parsley extract; - white pearl extract and sea salt; and - rose extract, viola extract and lavender extract.