Navigation System Device Recognition Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current navigation systems lack an effective device recognition mechanism to differentiate between users and devices within a vehicle, impacting their ability to provide tailored functionality and safety features, especially in emergency situations.

Innovation Solution

A navigation system that includes a device recognition mechanism, which identifies devices and users through a control unit, generating a maneuver-relative status and device function profile to control vehicle operations based on user roles and contexts, utilizing sensors and network communication to determine vehicle link status and user profiles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a navigation system implements device recognition mechanism to differentiate between users and devices, then user safety and system usability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments device identification and user identification into separate processes. The control unit first identifies the device (e.g., mobile phone, tablet) and then identifies the user (driver, passenger) associated with that device. This segmentation allows the system to handle different identification types independently, improving safety through accurate recognition while managing complexity through modular processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary device and user identification before providing navigation services or emergency responses. By pre-establishing the device-function profile and user role (driver/passenger) before critical operations, the system ensures safety requirements are met in advance, while the preliminary nature of this identification reduces the complexity of real-time decision-making during emergencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If the navigation system generates maneuver-relative status and device function profile for each device, then adaptability to different users and contexts is improved, but processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctionality tailoringVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates device function profiles with specific attributes tailored to each device type (mobile phone, tablet, etc.) and user role (driver, passenger). Each profile contains locally optimized information relevant to that specific device-user combination, such as emergency response preferences, notification methods, and control permissions. This local quality approach provides high adaptability while avoiding the computational overhead of generating completely new profiles for each interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit generates device function profiles in advance based on device identification and user role determination. These pre-generated profiles store maneuver-relative status information (driver vs. passenger context) that enables rapid response during emergencies. By performing this profile generation preliminarily, the system achieves high adaptability to different users and contexts without incurring processing delays when actual navigation or emergency responses are required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If the system automatically adjusts device functionality based on user roles and emergency situations, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic controlVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The navigation system automatically performs device identification, user role determination (driver/passenger), and functionality adjustment without requiring manual user input. The control unit autonomously generates device function profiles and configures emergency responses based on the identified context. This self-service capability dramatically improves ease of operation, as users simply need to be present in the vehicle for the system to automatically adapt to their needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges multiple functions into a unified control mechanism: device identification, user role determination, profile generation, and emergency response configuration are combined into a single automated process managed by the control unit. This merging reduces the apparent complexity for users (who interact with a single intuitive system) while maintaining the sophisticated capabilities needed for automatic adaptation to different users and emergency situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9383214B2Navigation system with device recognition mechanism and method of operation thereof
Publication Date: 2016.07.05 TELENAV INC
  • US9383214B2 patent drawing
  • US9383214B2 patent drawing
  • US9383214B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operation of a navigation system includes: accessing a device identification for identifying a device; generating a maneuver-relative status corresponding to the device identification with a control unit for representing the device associated with maneuvering a vehicle; and generating a device function profile corresponding to the device identification based on the maneuver-relative status for controlling the device or the vehicle.