Navigation Aid Device Multi-Point Calculation for Collision Risk

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current navigation aid systems face challenges in accurately determining and displaying the spatial relationship between a ship and obstacle objects, particularly at long distances, and in crowded routes, where many obstacle candidates make it difficult for operators to quickly and accurately identify true obstacles and determine necessary course and speed changes.

Innovation Solution

A navigation aid method and device that sets multiple calculation points in time to calculate and display the positions of a ship and obstacles, allowing for accurate determination of collision preventive actions by acquiring and updating information at each calculation point, enabling precise display of spatial relationships and alert conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single calculation point in time is used for trial calculation, then the calculation process is simple, but the accuracy of spatial relationship determination deteriorates due to information lag

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of spatial relationship determinationVSAvoidcomplexity of calculation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The trial calculation process is segmented into multiple calculation points in time (first calculation point, second calculation point, etc.), where each point performs calculations using information acquired at that specific time. This segmentation allows the system to capture temporal changes in spatial relationships while maintaining manageable calculation complexity at each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calculations at multiple time points before final determination. By calculating spatial relationships at the first calculation point, then performing additional calculations at the second calculation point using updated information, the system prepares accurate data in advance for collision risk assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If information is acquired at a single time point, then the information processing is simple, but the accuracy of collision risk assessment deteriorates due to outdated information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of collision risk assessmentVSAvoidcomplexity of information acquisition process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic information acquisition at multiple calculation points in time. Information is acquired at the first calculation point, then again at the second calculation point, creating a periodic update cycle that ensures current information is used for assessment while maintaining a systematic and manageable acquisition process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the first calculation point results to inform the second calculation point. The spatial relationship determined at the first point feeds into the subsequent calculation, allowing the system to refine its assessment based on updated information while maintaining logical continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If multiple obstacle candidates are displayed on crowded routes, then comprehensive navigation information is provided, but the operator burden increases making it difficult to quickly identify true obstacles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of navigation informationVSAvoidoperator burden in identifying obstacles
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and highlights critical information from the multiple obstacle candidates by performing separate trial calculations for each candidate at multiple time points. This extraction process identifies which obstacles pose genuine collision risks versus those that are distant or moving away, allowing the system to present refined, actionable information that reduces operator burden while maintaining completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different quality levels of analysis to different obstacle candidates based on their local characteristics. Obstacles that show potential collision risk receive more detailed multi-point calculation analysis, while clearly safe obstacles receive less intensive processing, optimizing the balance between information completeness and operational ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8423278B2Navigation aid method, device and program
Publication Date: 2013.04.16 FURUNO ELECTRIC CO LTD
  • US8423278B2 patent drawing
  • US8423278B2 patent drawing
  • US8423278B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure provides a navigation aid device that includes a calculation time setting module for setting two or more calculation points of time for calculating trial information, a ship-concerned information acquisition module for acquiring ship-concerned information including a position of a ship concerned at every predetermined ship-concerned information acquisition time, a ship-concerned trial information calculating module for calculating ship-concerned trial information including the position of the ship concerned at each calculation point of time based on the ship-concerned information acquired at the newest information acquisition time with respect to the calculation point of time.