Navigation System Deviation Cost Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current navigation systems do not consider user preferences when providing search results for intermediate points of interest, leading to suboptimal route deviations in terms of distance, time, and type of interest.

Innovation Solution

Implementing deviation cost-based filtering to prioritize intermediate points of interest based on user preferences, calculating total and route-deviation costs using factors like distance, travel time, traffic, and turn types, and adjusting routes to minimize overall travel costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If current navigation systems provide search results for intermediate points of interest without considering user preferences, then the system complexity remains low, but the route optimization quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute optimization qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by introducing multiple cost parameters (deviation cost, total cost, time cost, distance cost) to evaluate and filter points of interest. These parameters transform the route selection process from simple distance calculation to multi-dimensional optimization, improving route quality while managing system complexity through structured parameter management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the route evaluation process into distinct cost components (deviation from original route, total travel time, total distance, traffic conditions). This segmentation allows the system to independently calculate and weight each factor, enabling sophisticated route optimization without requiring a completely complex integrated system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If the system calculates and filters points of interest based on multiple cost factors and user preferences, then the route optimization improves, but the calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetravel efficiencyVSAvoidcalculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating cost parameters for each point of interest before presenting them to the user. The system computes deviation costs, total costs, and other metrics in advance, allowing users to make informed decisions without experiencing real-time calculation delays during route planning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by calculating only the necessary cost parameters required for route optimization rather than analyzing all possible attributes of each point of interest. The system focuses on specific metrics (distance, time, deviation) that directly impact route efficiency, avoiding unnecessary computational overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If the system provides all intermediate points of interest without filtering, then the information completeness is high, but the user experience quality deteriorates due to irrelevant results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experience qualityVSAvoidinformation completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the filtering criteria adjustable and adaptable to user preferences. The system dynamically adjusts which points of interest are displayed based on user-defined parameters such as maximum deviation distance, preferred time ranges, and importance weights for different cost factors, enhancing user experience while maintaining information relevance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system presents filtered results to users and can adjust filtering parameters based on user selections and preferences. This feedback loop ensures that the information provided remains complete yet relevant, as the system learns from user interactions to refine future recommendations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9008888B1Cost based navigation
Publication Date: 2015.04.14 COX COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • US9008888B1 patent drawing
  • US9008888B1 patent drawing
  • US9008888B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Determination of a most efficient intermediate destination while traveling toward a primary destination is provided. With respect to its effect on the primary destination, the most efficient intermediate destination such as a fast-food restaurant, gas station, ATM, etc., may be determined. The navigation system may search in a user-defined radius for all intermediate destinations and present the deviation costs associated with each destination thereby allowing the user to choose the most efficient option. The deviation costs may be determined by the navigation system with respect to user preferences for minimizing time, minimizing distance, minimizing fuel consumption, restaurant preferences, and the like, and their impact on the primary destination arrival time.