Navigation Device Map Correction Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing navigation device map data is often outdated due to the lengthy process of reporting and verifying errors, which can take months to years, and does not allow for immediate corrections to be applied directly on the device.

Innovation Solution

A method for users to load, select, implement, and store map alterations on a navigation device, enabling immediate corrections to be made and shared, bypassing the need for external verification, with features such as user interfaces for creating, viewing, and sharing corrections, and the ability to associate corrections with transportation types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If map errors are reported through external verification processes, then correction accuracy is improved, but update time is significantly increased (months to years)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection accuracyVSAvoidupdate time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the map correction process into two independent parts: (1) local on-device correction application, and (2) optional external verification. This allows corrections to be applied immediately on the device without waiting for external verification, while still allowing verification to occur separately for accuracy-critical corrections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables preliminary action by allowing users to apply map corrections directly on their devices immediately upon receiving correction data, without waiting for the traditional external verification process to complete. This preliminary correction application happens in advance of formal verification, reducing the overall update time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If centralized map verification processes are used, then data reliability is improved, but device productivity is reduced due to waiting for external updates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata reliabilityVSAvoiddevice productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the correction workflow into independent segments that can execute in parallel: local correction application on devices and centralized verification processes. This segmentation allows devices to remain productive with local corrections while verification proceeds separately, maintaining both reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where correction results from multiple devices are aggregated and fed back to the verification system. This allows the system to learn from actual field usage and improve verification efficiency, maintaining data reliability while reducing overall update cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If manual error reporting by users is used, then map completeness is improved, but processing complexity increases due to free text format verification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemap completenessVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables self-service by allowing devices to automatically process and apply structured correction data without requiring manual verification of free-text reports. Users can directly contribute corrections in standardized formats that devices can process automatically, reducing processing complexity while maintaining map completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter format of user submissions from unstructured free text to structured correction data with standardized parameters. This transformation enables automated processing by devices, reducing the complexity of verification while capturing complete map information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If frequent map updates are implemented, then navigation accuracy is improved, but device memory requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation accuracyVSAvoiddevice memory
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential correction data needed for navigation accuracy from complete map updates. Instead of storing entire updated maps, devices receive and store only the differential correction parameters, significantly reducing memory requirements while maintaining navigation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments map data into base map layers and incremental correction layers. Devices store the base map once and apply multiple correction segments as needed, allowing frequent updates without proportionally increasing total memory usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10156448B2Method of creating map corrections for use in a navigation device
Publication Date: 2018.12.18 TOMTOM NAVIGATION BV
  • US10156448B2 patent drawing
  • US10156448B2 patent drawing
  • US10156448B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An end-user can input a correction to a map error, directly on the device. The device is then able to use the correction without external processing of the correction. Hence, it is no longer necessary for an end-user to simply report errors to the map vendor over a web link, then wait for that map vendor to verify the error, update its maps and finally supply the end-user with updates—a cycle that can take months and sometimes years to complete. Instead, the navigation device can use the correction immediately. End-users can also share corrections with other end-users and also with a shared remote server that aggregates, validates and distributes correction.