Navigation System Using Driver Behavior Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current road navigation systems lack accuracy and effectiveness in determining optimal routes due to reliance on incomplete and inaccurate traffic information, failing to account for actual driver behavior and real-time conditions.

Innovation Solution

The development of a system that analyzes historical and current driver behavior data to identify decision points, compound links, and traffic flow impediments, using this information to determine preferred routes and actual delays, thereby providing more accurate and user-preferred navigation options.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If current traffic information sources (manual observations, traffic sensors) are used, then traffic information is provided to drivers, but the accuracy and coverage of the information deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic information accuracyVSAvoidtraffic information coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses drivers' own navigation devices to collect and report traffic information. Drivers inadvertently provide accurate traffic data through their navigation devices' natural operation, eliminating the need for separate manual observation or sensor deployment. This self-service approach improves both accuracy (since the data comes from actual navigation behavior) and coverage (since numerous drivers across the network contribute data).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where traffic information collected from drivers is processed and fed back to improve route recommendations. The navigation system continuously monitors actual driver behavior, analyzes traffic patterns, and uses this feedback to refine future routing decisions, thereby improving both accuracy and coverage over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If automated navigation systems use basic road information to generate routes, then route generation is simple and fast, but the route accuracy and user satisfaction deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute generation speedVSAvoidroute accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of driver behavior patterns and traffic conditions in advance. By pre-processing navigation data and identifying common routes and traffic patterns before actual route generation, the system maintains fast route calculation while incorporating accurate, behavior-based information that improves route quality and user satisfaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters used for route generation from basic road information to include aggregated driver behavior data, traffic flow patterns, and historical navigation information. This parameter transformation allows the system to maintain computational efficiency while significantly improving route accuracy by incorporating real-world driving patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If traffic information is collected from multiple sources, then information coverage increases, but the complexity of processing and integrating information worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation coverageVSAvoidinformation processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple information sources by collecting navigation data from numerous drivers through a unified platform. Instead of processing separate data streams from different sources, the system combines all navigation information into a single aggregated dataset that captures overall traffic patterns, thereby maintaining comprehensive coverage while reducing processing complexity through consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal data collection mechanism that serves multiple functions simultaneously: it collects traffic information, analyzes driver behavior, generates route recommendations, and provides real-time traffic updates. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate processing systems for each function, reducing overall complexity while maintaining comprehensive information coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9299251B2Learning road navigation paths based on aggregate driver behavior
Publication Date: 2016.03.29 INRIX INC
  • US9299251B2 patent drawing
  • US9299251B2 patent drawing
  • US9299251B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are described for generating and using information regarding road traffic in various ways, including by obtaining and analyzing road traffic information regarding actual behavior of drivers of vehicles on a network of roads. Obtained actual driver behavior information may in some situations be analyzed to identify decision point locations at which drivers face choices corresponding to possible alternative routes through the network of roads (e.g., intersections, highway exits and/or entrances, etc.), as well as to track the actual use by drivers of particular paths between particular decision points in order to determine preferred compound links between those decision point locations. The identified and determined information from the analysis may then be used in various manners, including in some situations to assist in determining particular recommended or preferred routes of vehicles through the network of roads based at least in part on actual driver behavior information.