Navigation Route Guidance Using Feature Importance Ratings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Navigation systems often provide confusing route guidance, as users may struggle with orientation and identifying turns, especially when environmental features are not adequately considered in the guidance messages.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that determine an importance rating for visible features along a route, incorporating permanence, seasonal dependency, visibility, prominence, and a preferred name, to provide more intuitive and context-aware guidance messages by referencing the most significant features.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional route guidance is provided without considering environmental features, then the guidance system is simple and easy to implement, but users experience confusion and difficulty in orientation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser orientationVSAvoidguidance system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates and stores importance ratings for multiple features along the route before generating guidance messages. This preliminary processing allows the system to quickly select the most appropriate feature reference without complex real-time analysis, resolving the contradiction between providing orientation help and maintaining system simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a new parameter - importance rating - that quantifies the suitability of different features for guidance referencing. By evaluating features based on multiple attributes (visibility, permanence, seasonality, prominence) and assigning numerical ratings, the system transforms the complex judgment of which feature to reference into a parameter-driven selection process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If multiple features are considered in guidance messages, then user orientation is improved, but the complexity of determining which feature to reference increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental context informationVSAvoidfeature evaluation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system converts qualitative assessments of feature suitability into quantitative importance ratings based on measurable attributes. Each feature is evaluated on parameters like visibility (0-3 scale), permanence (0-3 scale), seasonal dependency (0-3 scale), and prominence (0-3 scale), allowing complex environmental context to be processed through standardized numerical parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation of feature importance is segmented into distinct, independent attributes (visibility, permanence, seasonality, prominence). Each attribute is assessed separately and contributes to the overall importance rating, breaking down the complex evaluation process into manageable segments that can be processed systematically

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If seasonal features are included in guidance, then the guidance remains accurate year-round, but the system complexity increases due to seasonal dependency analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguidance accuracyVSAvoidseasonal analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Seasonal dependency is transformed into a discrete parameter with a numerical rating (0-3 scale) that quantifies how much a feature's visibility or relevance changes with seasons. This parameter allows the system to account for seasonal variations without implementing complex seasonal models, maintaining guidance reliability while simplifying the analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically determines seasonal dependency characteristics for each feature without requiring manual intervention or complex external data sources. The seasonal dependency parameter is self-determined based on the feature type and location, allowing the system to adapt to seasonal changes independently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8370060B2Method of operating a navigation system to provide route guidance
Publication Date: 2013.02.05 HERE GLOBAL BV
  • US8370060B2 patent drawing
  • US8370060B2 patent drawing
  • US8370060B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating a navigation system to provide a route guidance message for traveling a route is disclosed. A plurality of features visible from a road segment of the route is obtained from a geographic database associated with the navigation system. An importance rating for each of the identified features is determined. The guidance message references the identified feature having a highest determined importance rating. The importance rating considers a permanence or a seasonal dependency of the identified feature.