Robot Navigation Heuristics Validation Using Logged Trajectories

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic systems face challenges in maintaining accurate obstacle detection heuristics when transitioning between environments, leading to potential regressions in navigation performance, as manually tuning or updating these heuristics can result in difficulties in re-identifying drivable paths in previously navigated areas.

Innovation Solution

The method involves retrieving past trajectories and sensor data to evaluate and update obstacle detection heuristics, using subsequent environmental data to predict drivable areas and ensuring that updated heuristics do not regress in accuracy for previously navigated environments by comparing predicted drivable paths with stored successful trajectories.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If obstacle detection heuristics are updated based on subsequent environmental sensor data, then navigation performance in new environments is improved, but navigation accuracy in previously navigated environments may regress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation performance in new environmentsVSAvoidnavigation accuracy in previously navigated environments
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of updated obstacle detection heuristics by applying them to historical sensor data and predicted drivable areas before deploying them in real navigation. This advance testing prevents regressions by identifying problematic heuristic updates before they affect actual navigation in previously navigated environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from historical trajectory data to evaluate whether updated heuristics maintain navigation accuracy. By comparing predicted drivable areas against previously successful trajectories, the system can detect regressions and prevent deployment of heuristics that would degrade performance in known environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If obstacle detection heuristics are manually tuned or updated frequently, then detection accuracy in current environments is improved, but system complexity and tuning time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection accuracyVSAvoidheuristic tuning complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-evaluation of heuristic updates by automatically testing them against historical sensor data and trajectories. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for manual tuning and complex human intervention, while maintaining high detection accuracy through automated validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary automated testing of heuristic updates using historical data before deployment. This advance evaluation automates what would otherwise require manual tuning, reducing system complexity and tuning time while maintaining detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Speed

If updated heuristics are deployed without evaluation, then navigation responsiveness is improved, but navigation reliability may regress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation responsivenessVSAvoidnavigation performance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of updated heuristics by applying them to historical sensor data and comparing predicted drivable areas against previously successful trajectories. This advance testing ensures that only reliable updates are deployed, maintaining navigation performance consistency while preserving responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from historical trajectory validation to determine whether updated heuristics maintain reliability. By evaluating performance against known successful paths, the system ensures that responsive updates do not compromise navigation reliability in previously navigated environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12085942B1Preventing regressions in navigation determinations using logged trajectories
Publication Date: 2024.09.10 GDM HOLDING LLC
  • US12085942B1 patent drawing
  • US12085942B1 patent drawing
  • US12085942B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes receiving one or more past trajectories navigated by a robotic device in an environment, wherein the one or more past trajectories are associated with initial environmental sensor data and one or more obstacle detection heuristics. The method also includes determining, based at least on subsequent environmental sensor data, one or more updated obstacle detection heuristics. The method further includes determining, based on the one or more updated obstacle detection heuristics and the initial environmental sensor data, one or more predicted drivable areas in the environment. The method additionally includes, based on the one or more predicted drivable areas including the one or more past trajectories, using the one or more updated obstacle detection heuristics to determine future navigation of the robotic device.