NB-IoT Edge Signal Testing for Base Station Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current testing methods for network nodes supporting multiple carriers and Narrowband Internet of Things (NB-IoT) signals lack standardization and effectiveness in simulating challenging conditions, particularly in ensuring compliance with emission requirements across various radio frequency bandwidths, leading to inefficiencies in identifying potential interference and leakage issues.

Innovation Solution

A method and device for generating wireless test signals that include NB-IoT signals placed at the edges of the radio frequency bandwidth, along with additional test signals, to simulate challenging conditions and mimic real-world scenarios, thereby reducing the number of test cases while ensuring compliance with predetermined criteria, including the use of power-boosted signals to enhance leakage testing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If test signals are generated at the edges of the radio frequency bandwidth to simulate challenging conditions, then the rigor of compliance testing is improved, but the complexity of the testing procedure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance testing rigorVSAvoidtesting procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The testing procedure is segmented into distinct test configurations, each targeting specific edge cases and interference scenarios. By dividing the comprehensive compliance testing into manageable segments (different signal placements, power levels, and carrier combinations), the patent maintains rigorous testing while making the complex procedure more structured and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs preliminary action by pre-defining standardized test configurations that cover worst-case scenarios before actual compliance testing begins. These pre-configured test signals and scenarios are prepared in advance based on anticipated challenging conditions, allowing the testing to be both rigorous and systematically organized rather than ad-hoc.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If multiple test signals are used to cover all operating conditions, then the completeness of compliance verification is improved, but the time required for testing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance verification completenessVSAvoidtesting duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by focusing test signals on the most critical operating conditions, particularly edge cases and interference scenarios that are most likely to reveal compliance issues. Rather than uniformly testing all possible conditions with equal depth, the methodology concentrates testing resources on partially covering the most significant scenarios, achieving sufficient compliance verification without exhaustive testing of every possible condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by systematically varying key test parameters such as signal frequency placement (edge vs. center), power levels, and carrier combinations to cover different operating conditions. By changing these parameters across a defined set of test configurations rather than maintaining fixed test conditions, the patent achieves comprehensive compliance verification across multiple scenarios efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If test signals are placed towards the edge of the radio frequency bandwidth, then the ability to detect leakage and interference issues is improved, but the difficulty of meeting compliance criteria increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleakage and interference detection capabilityVSAvoidcompliance achievement difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by proactively placing test signals at edge positions where leakage and interference are most likely to occur, before actual operation. This preliminary positioning of test signals at critical locations allows potential compliance issues to be detected and addressed in the design phase, preventing problems rather than merely reacting to them during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potentially harmful effect of edge-placed signals (which create more leakage and interference) into a beneficial testing tool. By deliberately positioning test signals at edge locations where compliance is most difficult to achieve, the methodology uses these challenging conditions to reveal and address potential issues, ultimately leading to more robust compliant designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Ease of operation

If a standardized set of test configurations is implemented, then the uniformity of testing approach is improved, but the flexibility to adapt to different network node configurations decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting approach uniformityVSAvoidadaptation to different network configurations
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves universality by designing test configurations that are applicable across multiple network node types and configurations. The standardized test scenarios are formulated to be universally applicable to different base station implementations while maintaining consistent testing methodology, allowing the same test framework to verify compliance across diverse network infrastructures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates dynamics by allowing the standardized test configurations to be adaptively applied to different network node configurations. While the core test methodology remains uniform and standardized, the specific implementation can dynamically adjust to accommodate different carrier frequencies, bandwidths, and network architectures, maintaining both consistency and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10686536B2Testing base stations that support multiple carriers and narrowband internet of things signals
Publication Date: 2020.06.16 ALCATEL LUCENT SA
  • US10686536B2 patent drawing
  • US10686536B2 patent drawing
  • US10686536B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, device and computer program for generating wireless signals for testing a network node for transmitting Narrow Band Internet of Things signals, for compliance with predetermined criteria, the network node being configured to support multiple carriers and to support operation within at least one radio frequency bandwidth. The method comprises: controlling a wireless signal generator to generate one test signal in a frequency band towards one edge of one of the at least one radio frequency bandwidth and one further test signal in a frequency band towards the other edge of the same one of the at least one radio frequency bandwidth, the one test signal comprising a Narrowband Internet of Things test signal.