Numerical Control for Automatic Overlap Start Detection in Fixed Cycles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional numerical control devices for machining tools require manual specification of overlap control start positions in machining programs, increasing complexity and burden, especially when performing multiple fixed cycles.

Innovation Solution

A numerical control device and method that automatically determine the overlap control start position by measuring physical quantities during machining, such as sound or load data, to execute overlap control when the machining tool reaches the designated position.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual specification of overlap control start positions is used in machining programs, then control precision is maintained, but program complexity and creator burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidprogram complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines overlap control start positions by detecting machining states (such as tool contact with workpiece, chip formation status, or load variations) without requiring manual programming. The control device monitors machining parameters in real-time and autonomously identifies when overlap control should begin, making the system self-configuring and eliminating manual specification burden while maintaining control precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual programming of overlap control parameters is replaced by automated detection systems that use sensors, machine learning algorithms, or physical quantity measurements to determine start positions. This substitution transforms a manual, error-prone process into an automated, precision-based system that reduces program complexity while maintaining or improving control accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If manual specification of overlap control start positions is required, then control accuracy is ensured, but operation time and efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidprogram creation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection and analysis of machining conditions before overlap control is actually needed. By pre-establishing detection criteria and automatically identifying start positions during normal machining operations, the system prepares control parameters in advance, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual programming while ensuring control accuracy is maintained

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system continuously monitors machining parameters and uses feedback loops to automatically adjust and determine overlap control start positions based on real-time machining state. This closed-loop approach ensures control accuracy by adapting to actual machining conditions while dramatically reducing program creation time through automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated determination of overlap control start position is implemented, then program creation efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogram creation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device integrates multiple functions into a single automated system that can detect various machining states (tool contact, chip formation, load variations) and determine overlap control parameters across different machining operations. This multi-functional approach improves program creation efficiency while managing system complexity through consolidation rather than adding separate specialized systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary components such as sensors, signal processors, or algorithmic mediators that bridge the gap between raw machining data and control decisions. These intermediaries automate the determination of overlap control start positions, improving efficiency while containing complexity within modular, manageable components rather than distributing it throughout the entire system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20230229134A1Numerical control device and numerical control method for performing movement control of machining tool by fixed cycle
Publication Date: 2023.07.20 FANUC LTD
  • US20230229134A1 patent drawing
  • US20230229134A1 patent drawing
  • US20230229134A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A numerical control device for performing movement control of a machining tool by a fixed cycle includes a main control unit that issues a machining command to a machining device based on a machining program, a machining program analysis unit that pre-reads and analyzes the machining program, a machining state measurement unit that measures a physical quantity indicating a machining state during machining, and a start position determination unit that determines an overlap control start position based on the measured physical quantity, and the main control unit executes overlap control when determining that the machining tool reaches the overlap control start position.