NC Waveform Feedback for Correcting Vibration Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inexperienced operators lack guidance on how to perform successful vibration cutting when it is not successfully executed, as existing numerical control devices do not provide clear feedback on corrective actions.

Innovation Solution

A numerical control device that outputs vibration cutting commands and displays commanded and actual oscillation waveforms superimposed on a time axis, allowing operators to identify issues and take corrective actions by highlighting air-cut regions where chips are not broken.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If vibration cutting is performed without proper monitoring and guidance, then the machining process can proceed, but the operator cannot determine when or how to correct unsuccessful chip breaking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator ability to correct unsuccessful vibration cuttingVSAvoidlack of feedback information on cutting success
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by detecting the actual oscillation waveform during vibration cutting and comparing it with the commanded waveform. The system provides visual feedback through waveform display and audible feedback through tone generation when chip breaking is successful, enabling operators to immediately understand cutting status and make corrections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary monitoring system that includes detectors for measuring oscillation waveforms, a comparison unit for analyzing commanded versus actual waveforms, and a notification device. This intermediary system translates complex cutting process information into simple visual and audible signals that guide operator actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If only basic waveform display is provided, then the system remains simple, but inexperienced operators cannot identify specific issues or take corrective actions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem ability to guide operators of all experience levelsVSAvoidcomplexity of monitoring and display system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the oscillation waveform display into multiple cycles (n-th cycle, (n+1)-th cycle, etc.) along the time axis, allowing operators to compare successive cycles and identify trends. The system also segments feedback into distinct visual (waveform display) and audible (tone generation) components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses visual display of waveforms with different characteristics to indicate cutting status. While not explicitly using color changes, the system provides distinct visual patterns (overlapping vs. non-overlapping waveforms) that serve as visual indicators similar to color changes, enabling quick assessment by operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

3Reliability

If the system provides detailed waveform analysis and corrective guidance, then operator performance improves, but the information processing requirement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuccess rate of vibration cuttingVSAvoidtime for processing and displaying waveform data
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary comparison between commanded and actual waveforms in real-time during machining. The system continuously monitors and compares waveforms before making a determination, so that feedback is ready immediately when needed, minimizing any processing delay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a simplified decision rule: if the actual waveform overlaps with the commanded waveform in the display, chip breaking is successful; if they do not overlap, it is unsuccessful. This partial analysis approach provides sufficient guidance without requiring complex exhaustive analysis of all waveform characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11982988B2Numerical control device, machine learning device, and numerical control method
Publication Date: 2024.05.14 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US11982988B2 patent drawing
  • US11982988B2 patent drawing
  • US11982988B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A numerical control device includes—a screen processing unit that divides a waveform of a commanded oscillatory movement quantity specified by a vibration cutting command and a waveform of an actual position detected by detectors, into sections each corresponding to a unit time, and this screen processing unit displays, on a display unit, an n-th commanded oscillation waveform, which is an n-th waveform of the commanded oscillatory movement quantity; an (n+1)-th commanded oscillation waveform, which is an (n+1)-th waveform of the commanded oscillatory movement quantity; an n-th actual position waveform, which is an n-th waveform of the actual position; and an (n+1)-th actual position waveform, which is an (n+1)-th waveform of the actual position, being superimposed on one another along a time axis, where n is a natural number.