Non-Contact Obstacle Detection for Vehicle Door Wind Movement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing obstacle detection systems for motor vehicle closure members, such as doors and lift gates, fail to prevent collisions with nearby objects and do not adequately account for wind-induced movement, leading to potential damage and increased wear on components.

Innovation Solution

A non-contact obstacle detection system that includes a main electronic control unit connected to sensors like TOF, ultrasonic, and radar systems, which detect obstacles and movement, altering the closure member's motion to prevent collisions and account for wind-induced movement without the need for additional wind sensors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If powered actuation systems are used to automatically open and close closure members, then convenience and productivity are improved, but the risk of collision with obstacles and damage to components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor operation speedVSAvoidcollision prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The obstacle detection system performs preliminary scanning of the door's movement path before the powered actuation system initiates closing. If an obstacle is detected in the path, the system prevents the door from closing, avoiding collision damage while maintaining automated operation benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the door's movement path using sensors and provides real-time feedback to the control unit. During powered closing operation, if an obstacle is detected, the system immediately sends a stop signal to the actuator, preventing collision while allowing normal automated operation to proceed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If wind vanes or anemometers are added to detect wind, then wind-induced movement detection is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewind detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The existing obstacle detection sensors are made multi-functional by programming them to distinguish between obstacles and wind-induced door movement based on movement patterns and sensor data analysis. This eliminates the need for separate wind detection hardware while maintaining the ability to detect both obstacles and wind effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The obstacle detection system serves itself by using its existing sensors and processing capabilities to also detect wind conditions. The control unit analyzes the sensor data to determine if door movement is caused by wind rather than obstacles, eliminating the need for additional dedicated wind detection components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively prevents closure members from colliding with obstacles and reduces wear by accurately detecting and responding to obstacles and wind-induced movement, enhancing safety and system longevity.

Implementation Method 1

sensors like TOF, ultrasonic, and radar systems, which detect obstacles and movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Implementation Method 2

sensors like TOF, ultrasonic, and radar systems, which detect obstacles and movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic: Ultrasonic Vibration

Implementation Method 3

sensors like TOF, ultrasonic, and radar systems, which detect obstacles and movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Data Source

PatentUS11313167B2System and method for detecting vehicular door movement due to non-contact using obstacle detection
Publication Date: 2022.04.26 MAGNA CLOSURES INC
  • US11313167B2 patent drawing
  • US11313167B2 patent drawing
  • US11313167B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A non-contact obstacle detection (NCOD) system for a motor vehicle and a method of operating the non-contact obstacle detection system are disclosed. The NCOD system includes a main electronic control unit adapted to connect to a power source. At least one non-contact obstacle sensor is coupled to the main electronic control unit for detecting obstacles near a closure member of the vehicle. The control unit is configured to detect movement of the closure member, detect no obstacle using the at least one non-contact obstacle sensor, and alter movement of the closure member in response to no obstacle being detected while movement of the closure member is detected.