Nebulizer Mesh Selection for Medicine and Patient Compatibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional nebulizer treatments face challenges in selecting the optimal mesh for medicine and patient compatibility, as it is difficult for patients and pharmacists to determine the appropriate mesh type, leading to suboptimal spray particle diameter and amount of spray, which can result in inefficient treatment.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a computer-based system that acquires medicine attributes and patient breathing ability, using a mesh selection table to select a mesh with specific hole diameters, numbers, and shapes to achieve optimal spray particle diameter and amount, considering surface tension and viscosity of the medicine.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the hole diameter of the mesh is reduced to decrease spray particle diameter, then the spray particle diameter is reduced, but the amount of spray decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespray particle diameterVSAvoidamount of spray
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying multiple mesh parameters (hole diameter, number of holes, hole shape) to achieve the desired spray characteristics. Instead of changing only one parameter, the system adjusts multiple parameters in combination to simultaneously reduce particle diameter and maintain spray amount.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal mesh selection system that can handle different medicines with varying surface tensions and viscosities. By establishing a comprehensive selection table that considers multiple medicine attributes and patient conditions, the system provides a multi-functional solution applicable to various treatment scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Quantity of substance

If the number of holes of the mesh is increased to increase the amount of spray, then the amount of spray is increased, but the spray particle diameter increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamount of sprayVSAvoidspray particle diameter
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by changing multiple parameters simultaneously. When increasing the number of holes to boost spray amount, the system also adjusts hole diameter and hole shape parameters to compensate for the increase in particle diameter, thereby maintaining optimal spray characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the amount of spray is increased to improve treatment efficiency, then treatment efficiency is improved, but the patient cannot inhale all medicine leading to waste and choking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficiencyVSAvoidmedicine waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by considering patient breathing ability as an input parameter for mesh selection. The system uses patient-specific information (breathing capacity, age, condition) to determine the appropriate mesh, which then delivers a spray amount matched to the patient's inhalation capability, preventing both waste and choking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by customizing the mesh selection to each patient's specific breathing ability. Instead of using a uniform spray amount for all patients, the system adjusts the spray characteristics locally according to each patient's inhalation capacity, ensuring optimal delivery without overflow or waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Manufacturing precision

If the spray particle diameter is reduced to reach deeper lung areas, then treatment effect is improved, but the amount of spray required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespray particle diameterVSAvoidamount of spray
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction through coordinated parameter changes in the mesh design. By adjusting hole diameter, number of holes, and hole shape together, the system generates finer particles that reach deeper lung areas while compensating for the increased total amount of spray through optimized mesh geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for optimal nebulizer treatment by selecting a mesh that adjusts spray particle diameter and amount to fit the medicine and patient, minimizing main body adjustments and ensuring efficient delivery of medication.

Implementation Method 1

The liquid supplied to the space between the mesh and the oscillation source is sprayed to the outside through the fine holes as a result of oscillation of the oscillation source

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOscillation: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

the spray particle diameter and the amount of spray of a medicine are affected by the surface tension and the viscosity of the medicine, in addition to the hole diameter, the number of holes, and the hole shape of the mesh

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary pressure: Capillary Pressure

Data Source

PatentUS11097072B2Nebulizer mesh selection method, apparatus, and program
Publication Date: 2021.08.24 OMRON HEALTHCARE CO LTD
  • US11097072B2 patent drawing
  • US11097072B2 patent drawing
  • US11097072B2 patent drawing

AI summary

With a nebulizer mesh selection method it is possible to achieve optimal treatment which fits a medicine and a patient. A nebulizer mesh selection method includes a step of acquiring a medicine attribute, by a computer, a step of acquiring a patient breathing ability, a step of selecting a mesh that corresponds to the acquired medicine attribute and patient breathing ability based on a mesh selection table in which a predetermined mesh corresponds to a combination of a medicine attribute and a patient breathing ability, and a step of outputting the selected mesh.