Container Neck Finish Ramp Intersection to Prevent Cross-Thread

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing container neck finishes are susceptible to cross-threading issues due to the design of locking lugs, which can lead to sealing failures and child resistance issues during stacking and opening.

Innovation Solution

A container neck finish with a cylindrical outer surface, an axially facing sealing surface, a bead, and circumferentially spaced retention elements, including a first cam portion, an upturned portion, and a stop portion with a ramp that converges within ten angular degrees of the parting line, minimizing the likelihood of cross-threading by providing a precise engagement mechanism for the closure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional locking lugs with circumferentially truncated ramp portions are used, then clearance for neck ring equipment is provided, but cross-threading susceptibility increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclearance for neck ring equipmentVSAvoidcross-threading resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The ramp portion angle is changed from traditional designs to specifically 45 degrees, and the ramp portion extends to intersect the parting line rather than being truncated. This parameter change allows the ramp to provide both the necessary clearance for neck ring equipment and the precise engagement needed to prevent cross-threading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of truncating the ramp portion to provide clearance (which causes cross-threading), the invention inverts the approach by extending the ramp portion to intersect the parting line. This inversion allows the ramp to define the parting line position, thereby providing both clearance and preventing cross-threading simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Strength

If locking lugs with circumferential overlap are used, then structural strength is improved, but cross-threading resistance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking lug structural strengthVSAvoidcross-threading resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking lugs are designed with asymmetric features where each lug has a ramp portion that extends to intersect the parting line at specific locations. This asymmetric configuration provides structural strength through the lug design while the precise intersection with the parting line prevents cross-threading by defining clear engagement zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The neck finish is segmented into multiple locking lugs spaced circumferentially around the neck, with each lug independently featuring a ramp portion that intersects the parting line. This segmentation provides both the structural strength of multiple engagement points and the cross-threading resistance of precisely defined engagement zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If ramp portions are extended to intersect parting line, then cross-threading is minimized, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecross-threading resistanceVSAvoidramp portion alignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The ramp portion design inherently defines the parting line position through its intersection point. During manufacturing, the parting line is automatically established by the mold halves, and the ramp portion's geometry self-aligns to this parting line, reducing the need for additional precision adjustments or post-processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The ramp portion is pre-formed during the molding process with its intersection point with the parting line built into the mold cavity design. This preliminary action ensures that the precise alignment needed to prevent cross-threading is achieved during forming, rather than requiring high-precision assembly or adjustment afterward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3142934B1Neck finish for a container
Publication Date: 2019.11.27 OWENS BROCKWAY GLASS CONTAINER INC
  • EP3142934B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3142934B1 patent drawingFigure 1B~1C
  • EP3142934B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3

AI summary

A container neck finish (20) includes an outer surface (56) of the neck finish having a parting line (60b), an axially facing sealing surface (64), a bead (66) projecting radially outwardly from the outer surface and axially spaced from the sealing surface, and circumferentially spaced retention elements (30a, 30b, 30c) projecting radially outwardly from the outer surface, and being located axially between the sealing surface and the bead. At least one of the retention elements includes a stop portion (114') including a ramp portion (130') that extends circumferentially toward the parting line and radially inwardly toward the neck finish outer surface and converges therewith at a location within ten angular degrees of the parting line.