Needle Guard Arms Biasing for Retraction Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Healthcare workers face risks of accidental needle sticks and disease transmission due to the exposure of used needles during withdrawal and disposal, as existing needle safety systems do not adequately address the low friction and resistance issues during needle retraction, making them vulnerable to needle sticks.

Innovation Solution

The proposed needle safety assembly features a needle guard with a proximal wall and two arms that are biased away from the needle in a ready position, supported by a ring-shaped or projection-based support, which minimizes contact with the needle during retraction and automatically covers the needle tip upon a change in profile engaging the proximal wall, reducing resistance and preventing accidental sticks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the needle guard contacts the needle during retraction to ensure safety, then the protective function is improved, but the friction and resistance increase making retraction difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotective functionVSAvoidretraction ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The needle guard is divided into multiple functional segments: a body portion that guides the needle, and separate arm portions that can independently engage with the needle. This segmentation allows different parts to perform different functions - the body provides guidance with minimal friction while the arms provide protective engagement when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The needle guard employs dynamic arms that can change their position and engagement state during needle retraction. The arms are biased away from the needle in the ready position but can engage with the needle during retraction through interaction with the change in profile, providing adaptive protection that activates only when needed rather than continuous contact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the needle guard is designed to automatically cover the needle tip, then the safety function is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety functionVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The needle guard is designed to be self-actuating during needle retraction. The arms automatically engage with the needle through interaction with the change in profile on the needle shaft, and the needle itself drives the protective action during retraction. This eliminates the need for external actuators, motors, or complex control mechanisms while achieving automatic needle tip coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The change in profile on the needle acts as an intermediary element that mediates between the needle retraction motion and the arm engagement. This simple geometric feature on the needle shaft translates the retraction motion into automatic arm engagement, providing a simple mechanism for complex protective function without adding significant structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If the arms are biased away from the needle in ready position, then the friction during insertion is reduced, but the reliability of automatic engagement during retraction may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsertion easeVSAvoidengagement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The arms are pre-biased away from the needle in the ready position to minimize friction during insertion and maintain sterility. However, the geometry of the change in profile on the needle is designed to automatically trigger arm engagement during retraction, ensuring reliable protective function is activated at the appropriate moment without requiring additional actuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly reduces the risk of accidental needle sticks by minimizing contact between the needle guard and the needle during retraction, enhancing safety for healthcare workers by ensuring the needle tip is protected once the change in profile engages the proximal wall, thus preventing inadvertent exposure.

Implementation Method 1

a resilient needle guard having two arms biased away from the needle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3900769B1Safety needle assemblies
Publication Date: 2024.10.16 B BRAUN MELSUNGEN AG
  • EP3900769B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3900769B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3900769B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A safety needle assembly having a first hub (104) attached to a flexible tube (102) and a second hub (108) attached to a needle (106) projecting through the flexible tube. A needle guard (122) is positioned in an interior cavity of the first hub. The needle guard has a proximal wall (130) having an opening (132) and two arms (134,136) each with an end and wherein the two ends ((138,140) spaced from and biased toward the needle in a ready position. In a particular example, a support (126) is located inside the cavity of the first hub and wherein the two ends of the two arms on the needle guard rest on the support in the ready position.