Negative Electrode Density Zoning for Better Electrolyte Impregnation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rechargeable lithium batteries face challenges in achieving optimal electrolyte impregnation, which affects their cycle-life characteristics, particularly in taller battery designs.

Innovation Solution

A negative electrode structure with distinct regions of varying crystalline carbon active material tapped densities, including a center region with lower density to enhance electrolyte impregnation, supported by a current collector and a specific distribution of crystalline carbon materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the battery height is increased to achieve higher capacity, then the energy storage capability is improved, but the electrolyte impregnation becomes insufficient especially in the center region

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy storage capacityVSAvoidelectrolyte impregnation uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using different crystalline carbon materials with different tapped densities in different regions of the negative electrode. The center region (II region) uses first crystalline carbon material with lower tapped density (0.9-1.2 g/cm³) to facilitate electrolyte impregnation, while the edge regions (I and III regions) use second crystalline carbon material with higher tapped density (1.2-1.5 g/cm³) to maintain structural integrity and electrical conductivity. This regional differentiation resolves the contradiction between battery height/capacity and electrolyte impregnation uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Quantity of substance

If the tapped density of crystalline carbon material is increased to improve electrode density, then the energy density is improved, but the electrolyte impregnation capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy densityVSAvoidelectrolyte impregnation
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by spatially differentiating the tapped density of crystalline carbon materials across the electrode. The center region employs lower density material (0.9-1.2 g/cm³) optimized for electrolyte absorption, while edge regions use higher density material (1.2-1.5 g/cm³) optimized for structural support and conductivity. This resolves the contradiction between energy density and electrolyte impregnation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the negative electrode into three distinct regions (I, II, and III) with different material properties. The center region (II) is segmented as having different tapped density characteristics compared to the edge regions (I and III). This segmentation allows each region to be optimized for its specific function, resolving the contradiction between overall energy density and local electrolyte impregnation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Quantity of substance

If the battery is designed to be taller for higher capacity, then the energy capacity is improved, but the cycle-life characteristics deteriorate due to poor electrolyte distribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy capacityVSAvoidcycle-life characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using different crystalline carbon materials with different tapped densities in different regions of the negative electrode. The center region (II region) uses first crystalline carbon material with lower tapped density (0.9-1.2 g/cm³) to facilitate electrolyte impregnation, while the edge regions (I and III regions) use second crystalline carbon material with higher tapped density (1.2-1.5 g/cm³) to maintain structural integrity and electrical conductivity. This regional differentiation resolves the contradiction between battery height/capacity and electrolyte impregnation uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260051495A1Negative electrode for rechargeable lithium battery and rechargeable lithium battery including same
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 SAMSUNG SDI CO LTD
  • US20260051495A1 patent drawing
  • US20260051495A1 patent drawing
  • US20260051495A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples of the disclosure include a negative electrode for a rechargeable lithium battery and a rechargeable lithium battery. The negative electrode includes a current collector, and a negative electrode active material layer on the current collector. The negative electrode active material layer includes a I region, a II region and a III region which are separated by boundaries extending along a longitudinal direction. The II region includes a first crystalline carbon negative electrode active material, the I region and the III region include a second crystalline carbon negative electrode active material, and a tap density of the first crystalline carbon negative electrode active material is lower than a tap density of the second crystalline carbon negative electrode active material.