Double-Sided Negative Milling Insert With Near-90° Entering Angle

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Double-sided negative cutting inserts for milling face challenges due to their negative axial and radial tipping-in angles, which increase the difficulty of the cutting process and result in an entering angle less than 90°, affecting efficiency and tool wear.

Innovation Solution

A double-sided negative cutting insert with a quadratic basic shape and 90° rotational symmetry, featuring depressed central side surfaces on main side faces, which improves the entering angle closer to 90° and provides better clearance and stability, reducing the risk of tool damage and improving machining efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a negative axial tipping-in angle is given to the cutting insert to create relief behind the active surface-wiping cutting edge, then clearance is improved, but the cutting process becomes heavier and more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveclearanceVSAvoidcutting process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the cutting insert by providing a positive axial tipping-in angle (contrary to conventional negative angles) and specific radial tipping-in angles, thereby altering the cutting geometry to achieve both good clearance and easier cutting process. The main cutting edges are given a downward slope to counterbalance the positive axial tipping-in angle, optimizing the entering angle to approach 90°.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a negative radial tipping-in angle is given to the cutting insert to create relief behind the active main cutting edge, then clearance is improved, but the entering angle becomes smaller than 90° affecting efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveclearanceVSAvoidcutting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the radial tipping-in angle parameters (αr1 and αr2) to specific ranges (0° to 15° and 0° to 30° respectively) and combines them with a positive axial tipping-in angle and downward sloping main cutting edges. This parameter optimization ensures the entering angle approaches 90°, maximizing cutting efficiency while maintaining adequate clearance through the balanced geometric configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the entering angle is kept smaller than 90° due to negative tipping-in angles, then clearance behind cutting edges is improved, but cutting efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveclearanceVSAvoidcutting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent fundamentally changes the tipping-in angle parameters from conventional negative values to positive axial tipping-in angles combined with optimized radial tipping-in angles. The main cutting edges are given a downward slope to counterbalance the positive axial angle, ensuring the entering angle approaches 90°. This parameter transformation simultaneously achieves both objectives: adequate clearance behind cutting edges and high cutting efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If a double-sided negative cutting insert is designed with conventional geometry, then manufacturing is simple and cost-efficient, but the cutting process is heavier and tool wear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidcutting process difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains the simple quadratic basic shape and negative overall geometry of conventional inserts for easy manufacturing, but optimizes the specific geometric parameters: positive axial tipping-in angle, controlled radial tipping-in angles, and downward sloping main cutting edges. This selective parameter optimization preserves manufacturing simplicity while dramatically improving cutting process ease and reducing tool wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4338873A1Double-sided negative cutting insert and milling tool
Publication Date: 2024.03.20 SANDVIK COROMANT
  • EP4338873A1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP4338873A1 patent drawingFigure 1c~1d
  • EP4338873A1 patent drawingFigure 1e~1f

AI summary

A double-sided negative cutting insert for use in milling with quadratic basic shape and eight different working positions. The cutting insert (1) comprises a peripheral surface (10), which extends around the cutting insert between first and second major faces (2, 3) and has four main side faces (11a-11d). One main cutting edge and one surface-wiping cutting edges are formed at an intersection between each main side face and the first major face (2) and at an intersection between each main side face and the second major face (3). Each main side face comprises a first lateral side surface (13), a central side surface (14) and a second lateral side surface (15) arranged one after the other between two corner side faces (12) with the central side surface (14) located between the first and second lateral side surfaces (13, 15), wherein the central side surface is slightly depressed in relation to the adjacent first and second lateral side surfaces.