Neighbor Node Selection in Wireless Multi-Hop Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless multi-hop networks face challenges in efficiently selecting neighbor nodes for handover and cell selection procedures due to the lack of consideration for operating modes, leading to suboptimal performance and increased latency.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a method where nodes in a wireless multi-hop network receive and transmit cost parameters indicating the operating mode costs of neighbor nodes, allowing for informed decisions during handover and cell selection procedures, thereby optimizing node selection based on energy consumption, power status, and hop count.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional neighbor node selection methods are used without considering operating modes, then the selection process is simple and fast, but the network performance is suboptimal and latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork performanceVSAvoidnode selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having neighbor nodes pre-calculate and report cost parameters before handover decisions are made. The cost parameter is determined in advance based on operating mode, energy consumption, power status, and hop count, allowing the serving node to make informed decisions without complex real-time calculations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The cost parameter acts as an intermediary that translates complex operating mode information into a single comparable metric. This intermediary value enables the serving node to evaluate multiple neighbor nodes efficiently without directly analyzing all their operational characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Use of energy by moving object

If nodes select neighbor nodes without cost parameter information, then the selection process is quick, but energy consumption is inefficient and latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by having neighbor nodes report their cost parameters to the serving node, which then uses this information to make handover decisions. The cost parameter feedback loop enables the network to adapt to changing energy conditions and operating modes, selecting targets that minimize energy consumption while maintaining acceptable latency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Energy efficiency is improved through preliminary action by pre-determining cost parameters that reflect current energy consumption patterns. This allows the serving node to anticipate energy costs before handover, selecting neighbor nodes that will minimize future energy usage rather than reacting to energy conditions after handover occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If comprehensive operating mode information is considered in node selection, then network robustness improves, but the complexity of the selection process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork robustnessVSAvoidselection process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transforming multiple operating mode characteristics (energy consumption, power status, hop count) into a single cost parameter. This parameter transformation maintains network robustness by considering comprehensive operating mode information while simplifying the selection process through a unified metric that can be easily compared across neighbor nodes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230337086A1Selecting a neighbor node in a wireless multi-hop network using a cost parameter
Publication Date: 2023.10.19 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20230337086A1 patent drawing
  • US20230337086A1 patent drawing
  • US20230337086A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communication. In some aspects, a child node in a wireless multi-hop network may receive a cost parameter from a neighbor node in the wireless multi-hop network, wherein the cost parameter indicates a cost, due to an operating mode of the neighbor node, of selecting the neighbor node as a target node for a handover procedure, a cell selection procedure, or a cell reselection procedure. The child node may perform the handover procedure, the cell selection procedure, or the cell reselection procedure based at least in part on the cost parameter. Numerous other aspects are provided.