Neopentane Production via Catalytic Demethylation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing neopentane on a commercial scale are inefficient due to stoichiometric reactions that generate metal halides, high costs, and low selectivity, as well as the unavailability of suitable feedstocks, making it challenging to achieve high yield under mild reaction conditions.

Innovation Solution

A process involving the isomerization of C6-C7 paraffins to produce neohexane or neoheptane, followed by demethylation using a catalyst in the presence of hydrogen, which allows for the production of neopentane with yields greater than 40 wt% under mild conditions, utilizing a C4-C7 paraffinic feed stream such as light virgin naphtha.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If stoichiometric reactions of t-butylchloride and Grignard reagent are used, then neopentane can be synthesized, but large amounts of metal halides are generated and the process is difficult to scale up

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneopentane synthesisVSAvoidcommercial scale production
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the problematic metal halide byproducts from the reaction system by using catalytic amounts of aluminum halide instead of stoichiometric amounts, and by employing a demethylation step that converts the intermediate to neopentane while eliminating the metal salt waste

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the reaction parameters from stoichiometric to catalytic aluminum halide usage, and modifies the reaction conditions to include demethylation at elevated temperature to achieve commercial-scale production with reduced waste

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If neopentane is synthesized by hydrogenation of neopentanoic acid under high pressure and high temperature, then neopentane can be produced, but the process is expensive and has low selectivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneopentane productionVSAvoidselectivity and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the reaction parameters from high pressure and high temperature hydrogenation to moderate temperature demethylation reactions, achieving improved selectivity and reduced operational costs while maintaining neopentane production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses readily available feedstocks such as isobutylene and simple aluminum halide catalysts instead of expensive neopentanoic acid, making the process more economical and scalable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Manufacturing precision

If demethylation of higher carbon number branched paraffins is used, then neopentane can be produced, but suitable feedstock is not readily available in high concentrations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneopentane productionVSAvoidfeedstock availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses cheap and readily available feedstocks such as isobutylene and light naphtha instead of higher carbon number branched paraffins, making the process easier to manufacture on a commercial scale

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the feedstock from higher carbon number branched paraffins to lighter, more readily available hydrocarbons, and adjusts the reaction conditions to achieve effective demethylation with the new feedstock

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If hydrogenation of isobutylene polymer with selective cracking is used, then neopentane can be produced, but large amounts of heavier hydrocarbon components are also produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneopentane productionVSAvoidheavier hydrocarbon byproducts
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the heavier hydrocarbon byproducts from the reaction system by using controlled demethylation conditions that selectively produce neopentane, and by employing separation steps to remove unwanted heavier components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the reaction parameters to achieve selective demethylation that minimizes the formation of heavier hydrocarbon byproducts, improving the overall efficiency and reducing material loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process enables the economic production of neopentane at commercial quantities with high yield and selectivity, utilizing readily available feedstocks and mild reaction conditions, thereby overcoming the limitations of existing methods.

Implementation Method 1

demethylating the neohexane or neoheptane to produce a product comprising at least 40 wt % neopentane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

demethylation using a catalyst in the presence of hydrogen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Data Source

PatentUS10487023B2Production of neopentane
Publication Date: 2019.11.26 EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS INC
  • US10487023B2 patent drawing
  • US10487023B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are processes for producing neopentane. The processes generally relate to demethylating neohexane and/or neoheptane to produce neopentane. The neohexane and/or neoheptane may be provided by the isomerization of C6-C7 paraffins.