Hybrid NER Ontology Mapping for Synonym Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Named entity recognition (NER) processes face challenges in efficiently linking synonyms and mapping concepts to ontological standards, particularly due to high computational intensity, laboriousness, and inherent false positives, which complicate downstream data curation and search functionalities.

Innovation Solution

A method that automatically learns new synonyms for concepts, maps raw NER outputs to ontological concepts, accounts for false positives, and aggregates results from machine learning and rule-based approaches to provide a hybrid solution, utilizing processor-based techniques for acronym expansion, string matching, and ontology-specific screening to generate confidence scores and index associations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual curation techniques are used to link synonyms and map concepts to ontologies, then accuracy is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to laboriousness and time consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemapping accuracyVSAvoidcuration throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically learning synonyms and mapping concepts to ontologies without requiring manual human curation. The NER process combined with ontology mapping algorithms enables the system to autonomously identify entities, learn synonymous terms, and map them to standardized ontology concepts, thereby maintaining high accuracy while eliminating laborious manual work

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual curation process with an automated computational system. Instead of human experts manually identifying synonyms and mapping concepts, the system uses NER algorithms, vectorization techniques, and ontology mapping processes to automatically perform these tasks, substituting human mechanical effort with automated computational mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated NER processes are used to extract entities, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to false positives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveentity extraction speedVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the NER process outputs are evaluated against ontology constraints and consistency rules. The mapping process provides feedback by identifying when extracted entities do not conform to expected ontology structures, allowing the system to detect and correct false positives while maintaining high extraction speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by incorporating false positive detection and filtering steps before final entity output. The system proactively identifies potential false positives through ontology consistency checking and confidence scoring, preventing erroneous entities from being propagated to downstream processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive synonym linking is performed for all NER outputs, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases due to computational intensity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynonym coverageVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by performing synonym learning and ontology mapping selectively rather than exhaustively for all possible entity pairs. The NER process focuses on identifying relevant entities with sufficient confidence, and ontology mapping is performed for entities that meet specific criteria, avoiding unnecessary computational overhead while maintaining comprehensive coverage for important cases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240403556A1Technologies for relating terms and ontology concepts
Publication Date: 2024.12.05 TELLIC LLC
  • US20240403556A1 patent drawing
  • US20240403556A1 patent drawing
  • US20240403556A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure enables various technologies that can (1) learn new synonyms for a given concept without manual curation techniques, (2) relate (e.g., map) some, many, most, or all raw named entity recognition outputs (e.g., “United States”, “United States of America”) to ontological concepts (e.g., ISO-3166 country code: “USA”), (3) account for false positives from a prior named entity recognition process, or (4) aggregate some, many, most, or all named entity recognition results from machine learning or rules based approaches to provide a best of breed hybrid approach (e.g., synergistic effect).