Nested Emergency Alert Messaging for Mobile Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Commercial Mobile Alert System (CMAS) protocols, such as the Common Alert Protocol (CAP), are unable to deliver different emergency alerts to specific individuals within a geographic region, limiting the effectiveness of emergency messaging.

Innovation Solution

A system that determines a device's location within nested emergency alert areas and provides corresponding alerts based on its geographic position, using a processor connected to a memory with instructions for receiving and processing emergency alert information, allowing for differentiated messaging within concentric alert regions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single emergency alert message is broadcast to an entire geographic region, then all devices in the region receive the same alert, but the system cannot provide location-specific instructions to different areas within the region

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert messaging capabilityVSAvoidlocation-specific information
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides a geographic region into multiple nested alert areas with different priority levels (first priority, second priority, third priority). Each alert area is further segmented into sub-areas, allowing the system to broadcast different emergency alert messages to different segments of the same geographic region based on their specific location and risk level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the alert system provides detailed location-specific messages to different devices, then response accuracy improves, but the complexity of message management and area definition increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency response accuracyVSAvoidalert system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a nested area structure where second alert areas are contained within first alert areas, and third alert areas are contained within second alert areas. This nested hierarchy allows the system to manage complex geographic zones using a standardized template approach, reducing the operational complexity of defining and managing multiple alert regions while maintaining high response accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Ease of operation

If the system broadcasts multiple different alert messages simultaneously to different areas, then location-specific safety instructions are provided, but the protocol complexity exceeds current CAP standards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser instruction clarityVSAvoidmessaging protocol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent assigns different priority levels (first, second, third priority) to different alert areas, with each priority level receiving appropriately tailored emergency instructions. First priority areas receive most urgent shelter-in-place or evacuation orders, while third priority areas receive less urgent notifications. This local quality differentiation provides clear, location-specific guidance to users without requiring a completely new protocol framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8688071B1Donut alert messaging
Publication Date: 2014.04.01 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US8688071B1 patent drawing
  • US8688071B1 patent drawing
  • US8688071B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Different emergency alert messages may be provided to different mobile devices within a common geographic region subdivided into a plurality of inner regions. Each inner region may have different emergency alert messages and may be geographically located inside another region.