Eating utensil system

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing eating utensils often require separate tools for different functions, taking up more space and being less convenient for transport, while also lacking in functionality for cutting and scraping tasks.

Innovation Solution

A combination fork and spoon system with a recessed handle and interlocking mechanism that allows the fork and spoon to nest or connect end-to-end, featuring chamfered edges for cutting and a pentagonal bowl for efficient scraping, forming a single, versatile utensil for various eating tasks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If separate utensils are used for different functions, then each utensil can be optimized for its specific function, but more space is required and transport becomes less convenient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional versatilityVSAvoidtransport space
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines a fork and spoon into a single integrated utensil body, where the fork portion and spoon portion are formed as one piece. This merging allows the utensil to perform both fork and spoon functions while occupying only one utensil slot during transport, directly resolving the contradiction between functional versatility and transport space requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single utensil is designed with multiple functional portions (fork tines and spoon bowl) that can be used for different eating tasks. The universal design enables one utensil to replace multiple specialized tools, providing adaptability for various food types while reducing the total number of utensils needed for transport

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If separate utensils are used for different functions, then each utensil can be optimized for its specific function, but the number of utensils increases and convenience decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional versatilityVSAvoidnumber of utensils
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the fork and spoon into a single integrated utensil, reducing the number of separate utensils from two to one. This simplification maintains functional versatility while decreasing device complexity in terms of the number of individual tools required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The utensil is designed as a universal tool that can perform both fork and spoon functions, eliminating the need for multiple specialized utensils. This multi-functionality approach directly addresses the contradiction by providing adaptability while reducing the overall complexity of the utensil set

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Volume of moving object

If a combination utensil is used, then space requirements are reduced and transport becomes more convenient, but the structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport spaceVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The utensil is segmented into distinct functional portions (fork tines and spoon bowl) within a single body, allowing each portion to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining an overall simple structure. This segmentation enables multi-functionality without requiring complex assembly mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fork portion and spoon portion are integrated in a nested arrangement where one portion is formed within or alongside the other in the utensil body, achieving compact integration that reduces transport space while maintaining structural simplicity through unified formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

4Adaptability or versatility

If chamfered edges are added to the fork tines for cutting, then cutting functionality is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting functionalityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The chamfered edges are applied locally only to specific portions of the fork tines where cutting functionality is needed, rather than modifying the entire utensil structure. This localized modification adds cutting capability while minimizing the impact on overall manufacturing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The chamfered edges modify the geometric parameters of the tine surfaces, creating angled cutting edges from the existing tine structure. This parameter change adds cutting functionality through simple geometric modification rather than requiring additional manufacturing steps or components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11540654B2Eating utensil system
Publication Date: 2023.01.03 HUMANGEAR INC
  • US11540654B2 patent drawing
  • US11540654B2 patent drawing
  • US11540654B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A combination spoon and fork system capable of being stored in a nested configuration or used as a combination eating utensil with the spoon and fork connected end to end. An interlocking mechanism can interlock the spoon and fork in either the nested position or in the end to end configuration. The interlocking system allows the handle of the spoon to slide between rails on the handle of the fork and to snap and lock the spoon in place either nested with the fork or end to end with the fork to form an elongated combination eating utensil. The spoon and fork of the system can also be used separately from one another.