Nested Fulcrum Cutter for High-Force Spinal Rod Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Surgical cutters face difficulties in cutting stronger and stiffer materials due to insufficient leverage and mechanical advantage, making it challenging to modify or shape surgical fixation components effectively.

Innovation Solution

The development of cutting devices with multiple sets of lever arms and leverage arrangements that increase the mechanical advantage, allowing for greater force application while reducing the size, bulk, and complexity of the device, enabling the cutting mechanism to assume various configurations and positions without significant disassembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If multiple sets of lever arms are added to increase mechanical advantage, then the cutting force capability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting forceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements nested lever arms where inner lever arms are positioned within outer lever arms, creating a compact multi-stage mechanical advantage system. The first lever arm contains a second lever arm, which in turn contains a third lever arm, allowing multiple force multiplication stages without proportionally increasing device volume or complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting device is divided into multiple independent lever arm segments, each contributing a specific mechanical advantage ratio. This segmentation allows the total mechanical advantage to be distributed across multiple stages, with each stage being independently adjustable and optimizable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Force

If the cutter length is increased to provide more leverage, then the mechanical advantage is improved, but the device size and bulk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical advantageVSAvoidcutter length
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent places the cutting mechanism between the handles by nesting it within the space created by the multiple lever arm stages. This allows the effective lever arm length to be extended for mechanical advantage while keeping the overall device footprint compact through the nested configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent arranges lever arms in three-dimensional space with different orientations and planes, allowing mechanical advantage to be achieved through spatial arrangement rather than simply extending the linear length of the device. The lever arms operate in different dimensional planes to multiply force without increasing overall device length

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Length of moving object

If the cutting mechanism is placed between the handles, then the overall device length is reduced, but the leverage and mechanical advantage are decreased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice lengthVSAvoidmechanical advantage
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent nests multiple lever arm stages within each other, with the cutting mechanism positioned between the handles at the intersection of the nested lever arms. This nested configuration allows short handle lengths while maintaining extended effective lever arm lengths for mechanical advantage through the nested arrangement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs movable and adjustable lever arm configurations that can dynamically change their effective length and arrangement during operation. The lever arms can be repositioned or reconfigured to optimize mechanical advantage regardless of the fixed handle length, allowing the system to adapt its leverage characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides a significant mechanical advantage, allowing for efficient cutting of stronger materials with reduced user effort and device size, enhancing versatility and ease of use in surgical applications.

Implementation Method 1

incorporates multiple sets of lever arms and/or other leverage arrangements to desirably increase the amount of force applied to the material being cut

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentUS10905488B2Multiple fulcrum cutter
Publication Date: 2021.02.02 PACIFIC INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US10905488B2 patent drawing
  • US10905488B2 patent drawing
  • US10905488B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are devices, systems and methods for modifying, cutting and/or shaping surgical fixation components of various configurations, including spinal fixation rods and related components.