Nested Modular Hunting Blind for Transport Cost Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional hunting blinds, especially those made of wood or monolithic plastic/polymeric materials, are costly and labor-intensive to transport and maintain, with high shipping costs and limited mobility due to their single-piece construction.

Innovation Solution

A modular hunting blind composed of nested left and right halves made of high-density polyethylene, allowing for efficient transportation and assembly, with mating flanges and retaining mechanisms to secure the halves together, providing a 360-degree sight line and optional door for easy access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a monolithic plastic or polymeric blind is used, then the blind is lightweight and easy to install, but the transportation cost is high (about 30% of total cost) and warehouse space is inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of installationVSAvoidtransportation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The blind is divided into multiple modular sections (typically four quadrants) that can be separately manufactured and then assembled on-site. This segmentation allows each section to be compact enough for cost-effective transportation while maintaining the overall size and functionality of a full blind when assembled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular sections are designed to nest within each other during transportation, similar to nested dolls. This nesting configuration dramatically reduces the volume required for shipping and warehouse storage, making transportation costs economically viable while preserving the ability to assemble a full-sized blind at the destination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Device complexity

If a monolithic blind is used, then the structure is simple, but the transportation efficiency is low and multiple pallets are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidtransportation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The blind structure is segmented into standardized modular sections that maintain relative simplicity in design and assembly. Each module contains essential components (walls, roof sections, window openings) that can be independently manufactured and then quickly assembled using simple connecting mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple modular sections are designed to combine together to form the complete blind structure. The sections feature mating flanges and connecting mechanisms that allow them to be assembled into a unified structure that matches the dimensions and functionality of a monolithic blind, thereby improving transportation efficiency without compromising structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a wood blind is constructed, then the blind provides good concealment, but the construction cost and labor intensity are prohibitive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcealment effectivenessVSAvoidconstruction cost and labor
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The material parameter is changed from wood to plastic or polymeric materials. This material substitution maintains the concealment effectiveness (as the material can be made opaque and camouflaged) while dramatically reducing construction costs and labor requirements, as the plastic components are pre-manufactured and require minimal assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The blind is segmented into pre-manufactured plastic modules that can be assembled with minimal labor. This segmentation, combined with using plastic instead of wood, reduces both construction cost and labor intensity while maintaining the concealment function through the material properties and design of the modular sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Loss of energy

If a modular blind with nested halves is used, then the transportation cost is reduced, but the assembly complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransportation costVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blind sections are designed to nest within each other for compact storage and transportation. The nesting configuration is achieved through tapered walls or recessed features that allow one section to fit inside another, reducing transportation volume and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The blind is divided into sections with standardized mating flanges and connecting mechanisms. These segmented sections feature simple, repeatable connection systems (such as flange-to-flange bolting or interlocking features) that reduce assembly complexity despite the modular design, making the assembly process systematic and straightforward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8966831B1Hunting blind
Publication Date: 2015.03.03 STOLL CHAD
  • US8966831B1 patent drawing
  • US8966831B1 patent drawing
  • US8966831B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A modular blind includes a left half and a right half that are constructed through a molding process where one half can be nested within the other half during transit and when displayed for sale. The left half and the right half of the blind include mating flanges that are positioned adjacent each other and secured together to form the blind. A retaining mechanism or plurality of retaining mechanisms is utilized to retain the mating ends proximate each other. Each half of the blind includes a plurality of slots through which a gun barrel can be inserted or through which an arrow can be shot. The blind can optionally include a door in either half or both halves for ingress into and egress from the blind. Because the halves of the blinds can nest within each other, the cost of transportation can be significantly reduced relative to a blind with a monolithic wall construction.