Nested Moss Pole Structure for Water Retention and Branch Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional moss poles face issues with rapid water drainage, quick drying of moss, instability in soil, and lack of support for lateral branches and leaves, leading to water wastage and poor plant health.

Innovation Solution

A novel coir pole design featuring a perforated hollow structure with absorbent materials, a stackable second elongated structure, optional flexible arms, and supporting legs, ensuring controlled water distribution and improved stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If traditional moss poles are used for plant support, then the structure provides basic support, but the moss dries quickly and water drains rapidly causing water wastage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater retentionVSAvoidmoss drying time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a nested structure where the hollow pole is surrounded by an outer shell, creating internal and external moss chambers. The hollow pole contains internal moss that receives water directly, while the outer shell contains external moss that receives water through capillary action from the internal moss, creating a nested water retention system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces capillary wicking material as an intermediary between the internal and external moss chambers. This intermediary material transfers water from the internally watered moss to the externally accessible moss through capillary action, ensuring both chambers remain hydrated without direct water application to the external moss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Stability of the object's composition

If traditional moss poles are used, then the pole structure is simple, but the grip in soil is weak and stability is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepole stabilityVSAvoidpole structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs counterbalancing weights positioned at the bottom of the pole structure that extend into the soil. These weights act as anchor points that counteract the toppling force generated by the height of the pole, providing enhanced stability without significantly increasing overall structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extends the pole structure into the soil dimension by incorporating underground anchors and weights that protrude below the soil surface. This vertical extension into the soil provides a stable base that prevents lateral movement and toppling, adding a stabilizing dimension to the otherwise simple vertical pole structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Strength

If traditional moss poles are used, then the basic support function is provided, but support for lateral branches and leaves is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebranch support capacityVSAvoidpole structure
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single pole structure into multiple functional segments: the main vertical support pole, horizontal lateral supports extending outward, and optional vertical ties. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in supporting specific plant parts while maintaining overall structural efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs the pole structure to perform multiple functions simultaneously: the main pole provides vertical support, the lateral supports provide horizontal stabilization for branches, and the ties provide additional reinforcement. This multi-functionality allows a single integrated structure to replace what would otherwise require multiple separate support elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances water conservation, promotes healthier plant growth by maintaining consistent moisture, improves stability, and supports lateral branches, reducing the risk of overwatering or underwatering.

Implementation Method 1

Both structures, the first body and the second body, are surrounded by absorbent materials, cotton fiber and coconut coir rope, to enhance water retention

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Implementation Method 2

There is also a third body, a funnel part, that has an upper wider part and a lower elongated, narrower part. The funnel is hollow from inside and has a hole at its tip and is inserted and fixed into the soil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP4649820A1Moss pole for plant support and watering
Publication Date: 2025.11.19 NLC TANACSADOI CSOPORT KFT
  • EP4649820A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4649820A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4649820A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a novel moss pole designed for plant support and watering. The pole comprises a first elongated hollow perforated structure or pole, a second elongated structure, and absorbent materials surrounding both structures. Optional flexible lateral arms and optional fixing legs are provided for supporting lateral branches and enhancing stability in the soil. This innovative moss pole addresses issues of water wastage, rapid drying of moss, weak grip in soil, and lack of support for lateral branches, offering improved water conservation, plant health, stability, and support for gardeners and plant enthusiasts.