Nested Multi-Fuel Tank System for Emission Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Internal combustion engines face challenges in efficiently managing and combusting multiple types of fuels with varying carbon content, particularly in limited packaging spaces, where existing systems struggle to optimize fuel substitution rates and emission reduction while maintaining engine efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A multi-fuel engine system that includes separate fuel tanks for different fuels, with a secondary fuel tank housed within a primary fuel tank, allowing for adjustable fuel substitution rates based on engine load and emission control, using fuels like hydrogen, ammonia, and diesel, and employing a control system to optimize ignition timing and fuel delivery methods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple separate fuel tanks are used for different fuel types, then fuel flexibility and emission control are improved, but packaging space complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel flexibilityVSAvoidpackaging arrangement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies nesting by placing the second fuel tank inside the first fuel tank, creating a compact nested arrangement that reduces overall packaging space while maintaining separate storage for different fuel types. This resolves the contradiction by enabling multiple fuel types without proportionally increasing packaging complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the packaging space of multiple fuel tanks by allowing the second tank to occupy the interior volume of the first tank, effectively combining their spatial requirements into a single packaging envelope. This reduces the overall packaging complexity while maintaining fuel flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Object-generated harmful factors

If fuel substitution rates are increased to reduce emissions, then carbon content decreases, but engine efficiency may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon emissionsVSAvoidengine efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic fuel substitution by allowing the engine controller to adjust the ratio of first fuel to second fuel based on operating conditions, load requirements, and emission targets. This enables optimization of both emission reduction and engine efficiency under different operating scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fuel composition parameter by substituting low-carbon second fuel for carbon-intensive first fuel at variable rates. The controller adjusts substitution parameters based on engine load and emission requirements, achieving emission reduction while maintaining efficiency through parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If lower-cost secondary fuels are used to reduce operation costs, then fuel availability and cost-effectiveness improve, but emission control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost-effectivenessVSAvoidemission control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control where the engine controller continuously monitors engine operating parameters, fuel levels, and emission outputs to dynamically adjust the fuel substitution rate. This feedback mechanism automates emission control, reducing manual intervention complexity while achieving cost-effective operation through optimized fuel usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves reduced carbon emissions, increased engine efficiency, and cost-effective operation by allowing for the use of lower-cost, more available secondary fuels, while maintaining compact fuel arrangements and minimizing emissions.

Implementation Method 1

The second tank is arranged in the interior volume of the first tank and in contact with the first fuel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

Internal combustion engines may include compression-ignition and/or spark-ignition engines. The engine may combust multiple types of fuel.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS20240167443A1Methods and systems for multi-fuel engine
Publication Date: 2024.05.23 TRANSPORTATION IP HOLDINGS LLC
  • US20240167443A1 patent drawing
  • US20240167443A1 patent drawing
  • US20240167443A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for a multi-fuel fuel system. In one example, a system includes a first fuel arranged in an interior volume of a first tank and a second fuel arranged in an interior volume of a second tank. The second tank is arranged in the interior volume of the first tank and in contact with the first fuel.